SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › EIX vs INTC

Edison International (EIX) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

EIX
Edison International
$71.89
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

EIX
  • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 6.2x is 73% below the historical average of 22.9x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.01 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
INTC

    Risks

    EIX
    • ⚠Edison International scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — share issuance is offsetting repurchases.
    • ⚠High leverage (2.16x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    INTC
    • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EIX
    INTC
    Valuation
    $-649.50M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    -2.35%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    6.22
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    11.03
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    9.02%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    23.15%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    57.83%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    0.01
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    2.16
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    5.02
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    4.88%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    EIX: 5Ties: 1INTC: 3
    EIXINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EIX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EIX
    $-0.32
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $3.77B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-1.22B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EIX
    48.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 48.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $71.89
    Fair Value: $139.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EIX

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EIX
    27/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EIX
    -2.70
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EIX
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 93.0%Retail & Other 6.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,370
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EIX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EIX
    3
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.39M
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $37,270
    @ $74.54 · 2026-03-02
    ANDERSON JILL CHARLOTTE
    Officer
    $514,088
    @ $74.67 · 2026-03-02
    BOWMAN ERICA S
    Officer
    $94,264
    @ $73.87 · 2026-02-23
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $99,486
    @ $55.27 · 2025-10-30
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $647,560
    @ $54.42 · 2025-08-04
    BELIVEAU-DUNN JEANNE
    Director
    $178,666
    @ $54.34 · 2025-03-06
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $104,100
    @ $83.28 · 2024-11-15
    UMANOFF ADAM S
    General Counsel
    $2.13M
    @ $83.05 · 2024-10-31
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $2.04M
    @ $85.45 · 2024-08-26
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $115,770
    @ $85.00 · 2024-08-23
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $2.60M
    @ $80.12 · 2024-07-31
    SCHILLING NATALIE K
    Officer
    $187,285
    @ $80.00 · 2024-07-31
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $2.27M
    @ $78.43 · 2024-07-26
    CHOI CAROLINE
    Officer
    $757,996
    @ $75.77 · 2024-06-05
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $4.12M
    @ $75.13 · 2024-05-14
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $4.36M
    @ $75.01 · 2024-05-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EIX
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EIX
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    INTC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View EIX Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis