SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › EG vs GOOGL

Everest Group, Ltd. (EG) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)

EG
Everest Group, Ltd.
$315.96
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$307.13

Rewards

EG
  • ★Dividend yield of 2.53% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 8.4x is 30% below the historical average of 12.0x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

EG
  • ⚠Gross margin of 12.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Everest Group, Ltd. scores only 15/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.19 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
GOOGL
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EG
GOOGL
Valuation
$-22.33B
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
-174.96%
FCF Yield
1.97%
8.36
Trailing P/E
28.41
5.09
Forward P/E
22.88
Quality & Moat
8.88%
ROIC
20.83%
10.29%
ROE
31.83%
12.50%
Gross Margin
59.65%
N/A
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
0.24
Debt / Equity
0.16
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.40
2.53%
Dividend Yield
0.27%
EG: 3Ties: 1GOOGL: 6
EGGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EG
$0.19
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$4.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$858.9M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EG
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $315.96
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
20.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.13
Fair Value: $384.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EG

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.2%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EG
15/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EG
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EG
Insiders 1.5%Institutions 100.9%
No. of Institutional Holders993
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,206
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EG
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.79M
GALTNEY WILLIAM F JR
Director
$3.50M
@ $307.38 · 2025-10-29
LEVINE ALLAN
Director
$948,848
@ $306.08 · 2025-10-29
WILLIAMSON JAMES ALLAN
Chief Executive Officer
$337,970
@ $337.97 · 2025-06-11
GALTNEY WILLIAM F JR
Director
$1.00M
@ $348.64 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EG
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
LOSQUADRO GERALDINE M
Director
$540,945
@ $360.63 · 2025-03-18
VAN BEVEREN GAIL
Officer
$290,849
@ $350.42 · 2025-03-14
WILLIAMSON JAMES ALLAN
Chief Operating Officer
$74,000
@ $370.00 · 2024-11-14
KARMILOWICZ MICHAEL
Officer
$93,741
@ $348.48 · 2024-11-04
LOSQUADRO GERALDINE M
Director
$380,490
@ $380.49 · 2024-05-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
GOOGL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View EG Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis
Everest Group, Ltd. (EG) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io