Compare StocksED vs TSLA

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)

ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
$111.69
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$380.30

Rewards

ED
    TSLA
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $50.04 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

    Risks

    ED
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.07 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    TSLA
    • ROIC has declined by 17.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 18.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ED
    TSLA
    Valuation
    $-145.25M
    Free Cash Flow
    $6.22B
    -0.36%
    FCF Yield
    0.44%
    19.80
    Trailing P/E
    358.77
    17.21
    Forward P/E
    135.32
    Quality & Moat
    4.53%
    ROIC
    3.61%
    8.36%
    ROE
    4.58%
    53.25%
    Gross Margin
    18.03%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.17
    Debt / Equity
    0.18
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.44
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -2.79
    3.08%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    ED: 5Ties: 1TSLA: 4
    EDTSLA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ED

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    TSLA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ED
    $0.68
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $3.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.04B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TSLA
    $50.04
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $25.92B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.30T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ED
    185.0% Overvalued
    Price is 185.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $111.69
    Fair Value: $39.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TSLA
    367.6% Overvalued
    Price is 367.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $380.30
    Fair Value: $81.33
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ED

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TSLA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $380?

    +49.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +41.8%

    The market implies +49.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +41.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ED
    46/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TSLA
    31/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ED
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TSLA
    -2.86
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ED
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 73.8%Retail & Other 26.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,775
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TSLA
    Insiders 11.1%Institutions 44.6%Retail & Other 44.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,299
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ED
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $207.00
    MILLER JOSEPH
    Officer
    $104.00
    @ $104.00 · 2025-12-15
    MILLER JOSEPH
    Officer
    $103.00
    @ $103.00 · 2025-09-15
    SANCHEZ ROBERT
    Officer
    $2,311
    @ $96.29 · 2024-04-30
    CAWLEY TIMOTHY P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2,316
    @ $96.50 · 2024-04-30
    HOGLUND ROBERT N
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2,315
    @ $96.46 · 2024-04-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TSLA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.00B
    MUSK ELON REEVE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $999.96M
    @ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
    GEBBIA JOSEPH
    Director
    $1.03M
    @ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ED
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.33M
    DONNLEY DENEEN L
    General Counsel
    $218,993
    @ $113.94 · 2026-03-12
    MULROW WILLIAM J
    Director
    $892,553
    @ $112.81 · 2026-02-27
    KILLIAN JOHN F
    Director
    $220,522
    @ $96.89 · 2025-12-11
    KILLIAN JOHN F
    Director
    $145,680
    @ $97.12 · 2024-05-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TSLA
    2
    Sells (3M)
    17
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $319.71M
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $899,077
    @ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $10.69M
    @ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $25.61M
    @ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.17M
    @ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $918,137
    @ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $4.86M
    @ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $732,573
    @ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.40M
    @ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
    EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
    Director
    $170.64M
    @ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $32.73M
    @ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $30.81M
    @ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $32.10M
    @ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
    MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
    Director
    $13.19M
    @ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $718,111
    @ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $33.67M
    @ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $27.59M
    @ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $43.16M
    @ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.68M
    @ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.89M
    @ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $41.16M
    @ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $975,015
    @ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $35.25M
    @ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $39.79M
    @ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.48M
    @ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $35.34M
    @ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.80M
    @ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $34.60M
    @ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $15.14M
    @ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $65,867
    @ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $14.60M
    @ $219.96 · 2024-07-25
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $113,151
    @ $174.35 · 2024-06-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $17.32M
    @ $184.86 · 2024-05-06
    BAGLINO ANDREW D
    Officer
    $1.85M
    @ $176.20 · 2024-04-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ED
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TSLA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ED
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    TSLA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    View ED Full AnalysisView TSLA Full Analysis