Compare StocksED vs ORCL

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
$111.69
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$155.52

Rewards

ED
    ORCL
    • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Gross margin of 67.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Oracle Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    ED
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.07 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    ORCL
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • High leverage (4.15x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ED
    ORCL
    Valuation
    $-145.25M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-22.30B
    -0.36%
    FCF Yield
    -4.99%
    19.80
    Trailing P/E
    27.92
    17.21
    Forward P/E
    19.51
    Quality & Moat
    4.53%
    ROIC
    8.22%
    8.36%
    ROE
    31.86%
    53.25%
    Gross Margin
    67.08%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.14
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.17
    Debt / Equity
    4.15
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.44
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.48
    3.08%
    Dividend Yield
    1.29%
    ED: 6Ties: 2ORCL: 3
    EDORCL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ED

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    ORCL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ED
    $0.68
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $3.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.04B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ORCL
    $17.69
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $18.61B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$329.28B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ED
    185.0% Overvalued
    Price is 185.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $111.69
    Fair Value: $39.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ORCL
    235.9% Overvalued
    Price is 235.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $155.52
    Fair Value: $46.30
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ED

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    ORCL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ED
    46/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ORCL
    71/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ED
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ORCL
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ED
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 73.8%Retail & Other 26.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,774
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ORCL
    Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.3%Retail & Other 15.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,767
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ED
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $207.00
    MILLER JOSEPH
    Officer
    $104.00
    @ $104.00 · 2025-12-15
    MILLER JOSEPH
    Officer
    $103.00
    @ $103.00 · 2025-09-15
    SANCHEZ ROBERT
    Officer
    $2,311
    @ $96.29 · 2024-04-30
    CAWLEY TIMOTHY P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2,316
    @ $96.50 · 2024-04-30
    HOGLUND ROBERT N
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2,315
    @ $96.46 · 2024-04-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ORCL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $112,258
    FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
    Director
    $112,258
    @ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
    MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
    Director
    $947,913
    @ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ED
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.33M
    DONNLEY DENEEN L
    General Counsel
    $218,993
    @ $113.94 · 2026-03-12
    MULROW WILLIAM J
    Director
    $892,553
    @ $112.81 · 2026-02-27
    KILLIAN JOHN F
    Director
    $220,522
    @ $96.89 · 2025-12-11
    KILLIAN JOHN F
    Director
    $145,680
    @ $97.12 · 2024-05-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ORCL
    4
    Sells (3M)
    22
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.90B
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
    KEHRING DOUGLAS A
    Officer
    $6.82M
    @ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
    HURA MARK
    Officer
    $2.95M
    @ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $437,064
    @ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.93M
    @ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.80M
    @ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.07M
    @ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
    LEVEY STUART A
    Officer
    $5.93M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $641,958
    @ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $10.87M
    @ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $5.12M
    @ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    President
    $6.31M
    @ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $4.04M
    @ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $770,656
    @ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.33M
    @ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $267.24M
    @ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $794.64M
    @ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $764.01M
    @ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $1.74M
    @ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Officer
    $3.21M
    @ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $428,562
    @ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $291,620
    @ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $705.46M
    @ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
    ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $322.05M
    @ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $60.58M
    @ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $5.22M
    @ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $34.04M
    @ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
    BOSKIN MICHAEL J
    Director
    $5.30M
    @ $117.74 · 2024-05-07
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $2.32M
    @ $116.00 · 2024-05-03
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $2.90M
    @ $116.13 · 2024-05-01
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $346.77M
    @ $126.10 · 2024-03-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ED
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ORCL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ED
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    ORCL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View ED Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis
    Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io