Compare StocksED vs INTU

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU)

ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
$111.69
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$455.24

Rewards

ED
    INTU
    • Gross margin of 80.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    ED
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.07 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    INTU
    • 24 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ED
    INTU
    Valuation
    $-145.25M
    Free Cash Flow
    $5.30B
    -0.36%
    FCF Yield
    4.18%
    19.80
    Trailing P/E
    29.58
    17.21
    Forward P/E
    17.19
    Quality & Moat
    4.53%
    ROIC
    N/A
    8.36%
    ROE
    N/A
    53.25%
    Gross Margin
    80.90%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.17
    Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    No debt
    4.44
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.00
    3.08%
    Dividend Yield
    1.02%
    ED: 2Ties: 1INTU: 4
    EDINTU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ED

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ED
    $0.68
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $3.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.04B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTU
    $12.31
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.10B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$75.17B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ED
    185.0% Overvalued
    Price is 185.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $111.69
    Fair Value: $39.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTU
    5.8% Overvalued
    Price is 5.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $455.24
    Fair Value: $430.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ED

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $455?

    +14.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +10.1%

    The market implies +14.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +10.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ED
    46/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTU
    79/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ED
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTU
    -2.65
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ED
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 73.8%Retail & Other 26.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,774
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 90.6%Retail & Other 7.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,066
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ED
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $207.00
    MILLER JOSEPH
    Officer
    $104.00
    @ $104.00 · 2025-12-15
    MILLER JOSEPH
    Officer
    $103.00
    @ $103.00 · 2025-09-15
    SANCHEZ ROBERT
    Officer
    $2,311
    @ $96.29 · 2024-04-30
    CAWLEY TIMOTHY P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2,316
    @ $96.50 · 2024-04-30
    HOGLUND ROBERT N
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2,315
    @ $96.46 · 2024-04-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ED
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.33M
    DONNLEY DENEEN L
    General Counsel
    $218,993
    @ $113.94 · 2026-03-12
    MULROW WILLIAM J
    Director
    $892,553
    @ $112.81 · 2026-02-27
    KILLIAN JOHN F
    Director
    $220,522
    @ $96.89 · 2025-12-11
    KILLIAN JOHN F
    Director
    $145,680
    @ $97.12 · 2024-05-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTU
    2
    Sells (3M)
    24
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $121.78M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $228,121
    @ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $15.86M
    @ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.06M
    @ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $11.16M
    @ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $6.21M
    @ $646.47 · 2024-12-05
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $2.36M
    @ $646.83 · 2024-12-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.47M
    @ $617.42 · 2024-10-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $466,015
    @ $601.31 · 2024-10-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ED
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ED
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    View ED Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis