SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › ED vs INTC

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
$111.69
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Risks

ED
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 1.07 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ED
INTC
Valuation
$-145.25M
Free Cash Flow
$-4.50B
-0.36%
FCF Yield
-1.95%
19.80
Trailing P/E
N/A
17.21
Forward P/E
46.59
Quality & Moat
4.53%
ROIC
1.24%
8.36%
ROE
-0.21%
53.25%
Gross Margin
36.56%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
1.17
Debt / Equity
0.37
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.44
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.77
3.08%
Dividend Yield
N/A
ED: 6Ties: 1INTC: 2
EDINTC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ED

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ED
$0.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$3.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.04B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ED
185.0% Overvalued
Price is 185.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $111.69
Fair Value: $39.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $46.18
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ED

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

INTC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ED
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ED
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTC
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ED
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 73.8%Retail & Other 26.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,775
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,156
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ED
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $207.00
MILLER JOSEPH
Officer
$104.00
@ $104.00 · 2025-12-15
MILLER JOSEPH
Officer
$103.00
@ $103.00 · 2025-09-15
SANCHEZ ROBERT
Officer
$2,311
@ $96.29 · 2024-04-30
CAWLEY TIMOTHY P
Chief Executive Officer
$2,316
@ $96.50 · 2024-04-30
HOGLUND ROBERT N
Chief Financial Officer
$2,315
@ $96.46 · 2024-04-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $249,985
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,946
@ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$124,173
@ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$125,674
@ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ED
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.33M
DONNLEY DENEEN L
General Counsel
$218,993
@ $113.94 · 2026-03-12
MULROW WILLIAM J
Director
$892,553
@ $112.81 · 2026-02-27
KILLIAN JOHN F
Director
$220,522
@ $96.89 · 2025-12-11
KILLIAN JOHN F
Director
$145,680
@ $97.12 · 2024-05-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $981,000
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ED
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ED
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
View ED Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis