Compare StocksED vs GS

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS)

ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
$111.69
VS
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$809.50

Rewards

ED
    GS
    • Gross margin of 82.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.60 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    ED
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.07 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    GS
    • The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. scores only 26/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • High leverage (5.96x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ED
    GS
    Valuation
    $-145.25M
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -0.36%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    19.80
    Trailing P/E
    15.77
    17.21
    Forward P/E
    12.45
    Quality & Moat
    4.53%
    ROIC
    2.06%
    8.36%
    ROE
    13.00%
    53.25%
    Gross Margin
    82.88%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.91
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.17
    Debt / Equity
    5.96
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.44
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    3.08%
    Dividend Yield
    2.22%
    ED: 3Ties: 1GS: 4
    EDGS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ED

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    GS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ED
    $0.68
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $3.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.04B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GS
    $5.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $26.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$145.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ED
    185.0% Overvalued
    Price is 185.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $111.69
    Fair Value: $39.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GS
    65.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 65.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $809.50
    Fair Value: $2319.70
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ED

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    GS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ED
    46/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    GS
    26/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ED
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GS
    -2.00
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ED
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 73.8%Retail & Other 26.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,775
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GS
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,730
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ED
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $207.00
    MILLER JOSEPH
    Officer
    $104.00
    @ $104.00 · 2025-12-15
    MILLER JOSEPH
    Officer
    $103.00
    @ $103.00 · 2025-09-15
    SANCHEZ ROBERT
    Officer
    $2,311
    @ $96.29 · 2024-04-30
    CAWLEY TIMOTHY P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2,316
    @ $96.50 · 2024-04-30
    HOGLUND ROBERT N
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2,315
    @ $96.46 · 2024-04-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.00M
    HESS JOHN B JR.
    Director
    $2.00M
    @ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
    JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
    Director
    $1.49M
    @ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
    FLAHERTY MARK A
    Director
    $29,545
    @ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ED
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.33M
    DONNLEY DENEEN L
    General Counsel
    $218,993
    @ $113.94 · 2026-03-12
    MULROW WILLIAM J
    Director
    $892,553
    @ $112.81 · 2026-02-27
    KILLIAN JOHN F
    Director
    $220,522
    @ $96.89 · 2025-12-11
    KILLIAN JOHN F
    Director
    $145,680
    @ $97.12 · 2024-05-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GS
    6
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $59.99M
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.94M
    @ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,387
    @ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $4.49M
    @ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $8.89M
    @ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $1.62M
    @ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
    WALDRON JOHN E.
    President
    $13.69M
    @ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.41M
    @ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $4.31M
    @ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.71M
    @ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $3.31M
    @ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer and Treasurer
    $2.32M
    @ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $4.76M
    @ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $965,120
    @ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $3.06M
    @ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.00M
    @ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.67M
    @ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $2.51M
    @ $502.43 · 2024-07-16
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.02M
    @ $457.32 · 2024-05-10
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $2.16M
    @ $432.25 · 2024-04-29
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ED
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ED
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    GS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    View ED Full AnalysisView GS Full Analysis