Compare StocksEA vs JPM

Electronic Arts Inc (EA) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, EA is overvalued at $210, with a DCF intrinsic value of $115 and a margin of safety of -82%. JPM is fairly valued at $349, with an intrinsic value of $426 and a margin of safety of 18%. Of the two, JPM has the wider margin of safety.

EA
Electronic Arts Inc
$209.70
VS
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$348.92

Rewards

EA
  • Gross margin of 79.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Electronic Arts Inc scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
JPM
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.79 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

EA
  • 18 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • Market sentiment is in extreme greed territory (score: 78/100) — elevated optimism may warrant caution.
JPM
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $3.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EA
JPM
Valuation
$2.32B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
4.39%
FCF Yield
N/A
59.74
Trailing P/E
14.95
21.72
Forward P/E
13.96
Quality & Moat
17.92%
ROIC
5.52%
16.46%
ROE
17.79%
79.88%
Gross Margin
0.00%
1.30
PEG Ratio
1.63
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.31
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.36%
Dividend Yield
1.72%
EA: 3Ties: 1JPM: 4
EAJPM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

JPM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EA
Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
JPM
$3.95
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$120.20B
Δ Market Cap
+$475.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EA
82.5% Overvalued
Price is 82.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $209.70
Fair Value: $114.92
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JPM
18.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 18.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $348.92
Fair Value: $426.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $210?

+21.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.3%

The market implies +21.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

JPM

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EA
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
JPM
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EA
-3.08
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JPM
-2.17
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EA
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 6.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,433
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JPM
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.9%
No. of Institutional Holders6,387
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JPM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EA
1
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.60M
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$517,517
@ $207.01 · 2026-07-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$507,762
@ $203.10 · 2026-06-15
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$602,496
@ $200.83 · 2026-05-28
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$302,040
@ $201.36 · 2026-05-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $201.19 · 2026-05-20
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$501,344
@ $200.54 · 2026-05-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$508,026
@ $203.21 · 2026-04-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$499,884
@ $199.95 · 2026-03-16
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$299,842
@ $199.89 · 2026-02-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$498,825
@ $199.53 · 2026-02-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$510,667
@ $204.27 · 2026-01-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$510,284
@ $204.11 · 2025-12-15
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$302,475
@ $201.65 · 2025-11-20
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$502,643
@ $201.06 · 2025-11-17
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$802,049
@ $200.51 · 2025-11-07
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$240,961
@ $200.80 · 2025-10-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$504,477
@ $201.79 · 2025-10-01
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$1.98M
@ $197.94 · 2025-09-29
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$205,824
@ $171.52 · 2025-09-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$429,234
@ $171.69 · 2025-09-02
UBINAS LUIS A.
Director
$297,707
@ $170.51 · 2025-08-21
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$171,059
@ $171.06 · 2025-08-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$209,580
@ $174.65 · 2025-08-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$388,733
@ $155.49 · 2025-08-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$222,486
@ $148.32 · 2025-07-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$398,744
@ $159.50 · 2025-07-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$223,035
@ $148.69 · 2025-06-16
MIELE LAURA KAREN
President
$363,803
@ $145.52 · 2025-06-02
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$151,320
@ $151.32 · 2025-05-20
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$302,090
@ $151.04 · 2025-05-16
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$224,462
@ $149.64 · 2025-05-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$388,929
@ $155.57 · 2025-05-08
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$218,468
@ $145.65 · 2025-04-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$362,764
@ $145.11 · 2025-04-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$208,470
@ $138.98 · 2025-03-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$325,837
@ $130.33 · 2025-03-03
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$130,108
@ $130.11 · 2025-02-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$192,900
@ $128.60 · 2025-02-18
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$327,078
@ $130.83 · 2025-02-06
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$215,175
@ $143.45 · 2025-01-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$365,371
@ $146.15 · 2025-01-02
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$148,180
@ $148.18 · 2024-12-26
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$234,409
@ $156.27 · 2024-12-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JPM
3
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $96.58M
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$882,026
@ $352.81 · 2026-09-10
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$903,518
@ $361.41 · 2026-08-11
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$1.81M
@ $330.73 · 2026-06-22
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$1.64M
@ $300.27 · 2026-05-20
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$949,658
@ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.98M
@ $298.36 · 2026-05-15
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.70M
@ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.26M
@ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.52M
@ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$935,032
@ $309.41 · 2026-05-05
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.32M
@ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.80M
@ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$1.72M
@ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$40.00M
@ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$970,660
@ $306.59 · 2026-04-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.78M
@ $306.57 · 2026-04-15
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.74M
@ $306.58 · 2026-04-15
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$127,761
@ $295.06 · 2026-03-23
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$15.36M
@ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$132,684
@ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$886,157
@ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$627,207
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.07M
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.30M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.68M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$904,890
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$640,295
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.79M
@ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.09M
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$301,311
@ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.83M
@ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.39M
@ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.61M
@ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$1.57M
@ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
LAKE MARIANNE
Officer
$3.28M
@ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$2.71M
@ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.69M
@ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$3.29M
@ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.54M
@ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$10.03M
@ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.38M
@ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$31.50M
@ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$6.18M
@ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.06M
@ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$308,652
@ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$506,698
@ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$10.12M
@ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$337,610
@ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.15M
@ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$554,054
@ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$919,371
@ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.47M
@ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$971,646
@ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EA
FearGreed
😏Greed(78/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 3 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JPM
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (78)
JPM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View EA Full AnalysisView JPM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: EA vs JPM

Is Electronic Arts Inc or JPMorgan Chase & Co. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, JPM trades at a 18.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $426 vs. price $349), compared to EA's -82.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $115 vs. $210).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Electronic Arts Inc or JPMorgan Chase & Co.?

JPM scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while EA scores 90/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is JPMorgan Chase & Co. in financial distress?

JPM's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EA scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Electronic Arts Inc or JPMorgan Chase & Co.?

EA earns 17.9% ROIC versus JPM's 5.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Electronic Arts Inc's or JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s?

EA's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to JPM's 79/100 (Safe). EA has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

EA vs JPM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io