Compare StocksEA vs INTC

Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, EA is overvalued at $202, with a DCF intrinsic value of $91 and a margin of safety of -123%. INTC is overvalued at $134, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. Of the two, EA has the wider margin of safety.

EA
Electronic Arts Inc.
$202.15
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99

Rewards

EA
  • Gross margin of 79.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Electronic Arts Inc. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
INTC

    Risks

    EA
    • Trailing P/E of 57.6x is 26% above the historical average of 45.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • 5 insider sales totaling $2.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EA
    INTC
    Valuation
    $2.22B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    4.38%
    FCF Yield
    -1.23%
    57.59
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    21.05
    Forward P/E
    86.70
    Quality & Moat
    16.57%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    13.49%
    ROE
    -2.91%
    78.97%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    1.26
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.10
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.76
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    0.37%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    EA: 10Ties: 1INTC: 0
    EAINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EA
    $4.96
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.69B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$13.33B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EA
    123.1% Overvalued
    Price is 123.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $202.15
    Fair Value: $90.63
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $202?

    +20.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.2%

    The market implies +20.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EA
    90/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EA
    -3.08
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EA
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 95.2%Retail & Other 4.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,466
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EA
    5
    Sells (3M)
    24
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $11.89M
    KELLY ERIC CHARLES
    Officer
    $602,496
    @ $200.83 · 2026-05-28
    CANFIELD STUART
    Chief Financial Officer
    $302,040
    @ $201.36 · 2026-05-20
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $201.19 · 2026-05-20
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $501,344
    @ $200.54 · 2026-05-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $508,026
    @ $203.21 · 2026-04-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $499,884
    @ $199.95 · 2026-03-16
    CANFIELD STUART
    Chief Financial Officer
    $299,842
    @ $199.89 · 2026-02-17
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $498,825
    @ $199.53 · 2026-02-17
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $510,667
    @ $204.27 · 2026-01-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $510,284
    @ $204.11 · 2025-12-15
    CANFIELD STUART
    Chief Financial Officer
    $302,475
    @ $201.65 · 2025-11-20
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $502,643
    @ $201.06 · 2025-11-17
    KELLY ERIC CHARLES
    Officer
    $802,049
    @ $200.51 · 2025-11-07
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $240,961
    @ $200.80 · 2025-10-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $504,477
    @ $201.79 · 2025-10-01
    CANFIELD STUART
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.98M
    @ $197.94 · 2025-09-29
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $205,824
    @ $171.52 · 2025-09-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $429,234
    @ $171.69 · 2025-09-02
    UBINAS LUIS A.
    Director
    $297,707
    @ $170.51 · 2025-08-21
    CANFIELD STUART
    Chief Financial Officer
    $171,059
    @ $171.06 · 2025-08-20
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $209,580
    @ $174.65 · 2025-08-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $388,733
    @ $155.49 · 2025-08-01
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $222,486
    @ $148.32 · 2025-07-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $398,744
    @ $159.50 · 2025-07-01
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $223,035
    @ $148.69 · 2025-06-16
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    President
    $363,803
    @ $145.52 · 2025-06-02
    CANFIELD STUART
    Chief Financial Officer
    $151,320
    @ $151.32 · 2025-05-20
    KELLY ERIC CHARLES
    Officer
    $302,090
    @ $151.04 · 2025-05-16
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $224,462
    @ $149.64 · 2025-05-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $388,929
    @ $155.57 · 2025-05-08
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $218,468
    @ $145.65 · 2025-04-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $362,764
    @ $145.11 · 2025-04-01
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $208,470
    @ $138.98 · 2025-03-17
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $325,837
    @ $130.33 · 2025-03-03
    CANFIELD STUART
    Chief Financial Officer
    $130,108
    @ $130.11 · 2025-02-20
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $192,900
    @ $128.60 · 2025-02-18
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $327,078
    @ $130.83 · 2025-02-06
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $215,175
    @ $143.45 · 2025-01-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $365,371
    @ $146.15 · 2025-01-02
    CANFIELD STUART
    Chief Financial Officer
    $148,180
    @ $148.18 · 2024-12-26
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $234,409
    @ $156.27 · 2024-12-16
    SCHATZ JACOB J
    Officer
    $244,950
    @ $163.30 · 2024-11-15
    MIELE LAURA KAREN
    Officer
    $395,086
    @ $158.03 · 2024-11-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EA
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(68/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View EA Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: EA vs INTC

    Is Electronic Arts Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, EA trades at a -123.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $91 vs. price $202), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Electronic Arts Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    EA scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EA scores 6.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Electronic Arts Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) generates a 4.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's -1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Electronic Arts Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    EA earns 16.6% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    EA vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io