Compare StocksEA vs GS

Electronic Arts Inc (EA) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, EA is overvalued at $210, with a DCF intrinsic value of $115 and a margin of safety of -82%. GS is undervalued at $938, with an intrinsic value of $1956 and a margin of safety of 52%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

EA
Electronic Arts Inc
$209.70
VS
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$937.98

Rewards

EA
  • Gross margin of 79.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Electronic Arts Inc scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
GS
  • Gross margin of 82.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

EA
  • 18 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • Market sentiment is in extreme greed territory (score: 78/100) — elevated optimism may warrant caution.
GS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 16 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EA
GS
Valuation
$2.32B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
4.39%
FCF Yield
N/A
59.74
Trailing P/E
14.49
21.72
Forward P/E
12.67
Quality & Moat
17.92%
ROIC
2.20%
16.46%
ROE
16.90%
79.88%
Gross Margin
82.08%
1.30
PEG Ratio
1.22
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.31
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.36%
Dividend Yield
2.13%
EA: 1Ties: 3GS: 5
EAGS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EA
Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EA
82.5% Overvalued
Price is 82.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $209.70
Fair Value: $114.92
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GS
52.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 52.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $937.98
Fair Value: $1956.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $210?

+21.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.3%

The market implies +21.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EA
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EA
-3.08
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EA
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 6.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,433
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 23.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,994
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
FLAHERTY MARK A
Director
$29,545
@ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EA
1
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.60M
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$517,517
@ $207.01 · 2026-07-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$507,762
@ $203.10 · 2026-06-15
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$602,496
@ $200.83 · 2026-05-28
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$302,040
@ $201.36 · 2026-05-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $201.19 · 2026-05-20
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$501,344
@ $200.54 · 2026-05-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$508,026
@ $203.21 · 2026-04-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$499,884
@ $199.95 · 2026-03-16
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$299,842
@ $199.89 · 2026-02-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$498,825
@ $199.53 · 2026-02-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$510,667
@ $204.27 · 2026-01-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$510,284
@ $204.11 · 2025-12-15
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$302,475
@ $201.65 · 2025-11-20
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$502,643
@ $201.06 · 2025-11-17
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$802,049
@ $200.51 · 2025-11-07
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$240,961
@ $200.80 · 2025-10-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$504,477
@ $201.79 · 2025-10-01
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$1.98M
@ $197.94 · 2025-09-29
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$205,824
@ $171.52 · 2025-09-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$429,234
@ $171.69 · 2025-09-02
UBINAS LUIS A.
Director
$297,707
@ $170.51 · 2025-08-21
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$171,059
@ $171.06 · 2025-08-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$209,580
@ $174.65 · 2025-08-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$388,733
@ $155.49 · 2025-08-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$222,486
@ $148.32 · 2025-07-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$398,744
@ $159.50 · 2025-07-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$223,035
@ $148.69 · 2025-06-16
MIELE LAURA KAREN
President
$363,803
@ $145.52 · 2025-06-02
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$151,320
@ $151.32 · 2025-05-20
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$302,090
@ $151.04 · 2025-05-16
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$224,462
@ $149.64 · 2025-05-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$388,929
@ $155.57 · 2025-05-08
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$218,468
@ $145.65 · 2025-04-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$362,764
@ $145.11 · 2025-04-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$208,470
@ $138.98 · 2025-03-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$325,837
@ $130.33 · 2025-03-03
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$130,108
@ $130.11 · 2025-02-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$192,900
@ $128.60 · 2025-02-18
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$327,078
@ $130.83 · 2025-02-06
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$215,175
@ $143.45 · 2025-01-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$365,371
@ $146.15 · 2025-01-02
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$148,180
@ $148.18 · 2024-12-26
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$234,409
@ $156.27 · 2024-12-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GS
3
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $65.54M
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$620,280
@ $1033.80 · 2026-08-28
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$184,445
@ $1053.97 · 2026-08-04
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$287,951
@ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EA
FearGreed
😏Greed(78/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 3 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (78)
GS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View EA Full AnalysisView GS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: EA vs GS

Is Electronic Arts Inc or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 52.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1956 vs. price $938), compared to EA's -82.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $115 vs. $210).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Electronic Arts Inc or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?

EA scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EA scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Electronic Arts Inc or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?

EA earns 17.9% ROIC versus GS's 2.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Electronic Arts Inc's or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s?

EA's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to GS's 79/100 (Safe). EA has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

EA vs GS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io