Compare StocksDUK vs JPM

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, DUK is overvalued at $124, with a DCF intrinsic value of $16 and a margin of safety of -655%. JPM is undervalued at $325, with an intrinsic value of $498 and a margin of safety of 35%. Of the two, JPM has the wider margin of safety.

DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
$123.86
VS
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$325.22

Rewards

DUK
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $10.43 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 20% below the historical average of 23.9x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
JPM
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.79 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

DUK
  • PEG ratio of 2.67 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.58x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
JPM
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.6x is 25% above the historical average of 12.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DUK
JPM
Valuation
$-2.25B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
-2.33%
FCF Yield
N/A
19.06
Trailing P/E
15.57
17.27
Forward P/E
13.80
Quality & Moat
4.46%
ROIC
4.54%
9.66%
ROE
16.47%
51.05%
Gross Margin
0.00%
2.67
PEG Ratio
1.76
Balance Sheet Safety
1.58
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.41
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
3.38%
Dividend Yield
1.77%
DUK: 2Ties: 2JPM: 4
DUKJPM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DUK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

JPM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DUK
$4.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.58B
Δ Market Cap
+$11.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JPM
$3.95
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$120.20B
Δ Market Cap
+$475.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DUK
655.4% Overvalued
Price is 655.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $123.86
Fair Value: $16.40
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JPM
34.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 34.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $325.22
Fair Value: $498.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DUK

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

JPM

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DUK
47/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
JPM
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DUK
-2.76
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JPM
-2.17
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DUK
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 70.8%Retail & Other 29.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,989
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JPM
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.6%Retail & Other 24.0%
No. of Institutional Holders6,275
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DUK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JPM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DUK
2
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.14M
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$438,025
@ $125.15 · 2026-05-11
SIDERIS HARRY K.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $124.37 · 2026-05-08
GHARTEY-TAGOE KODWO
Officer
$2.40M
@ $131.57 · 2026-03-02
REPKO REGIS T
Officer
$86,853
@ $131.00 · 2026-03-02
REPKO REGIS T
Officer
$123,001
@ $127.86 · 2026-02-24
SAVOY BRIAN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.53M
@ $127.69 · 2026-02-23
REPKO REGIS T
Officer
$556,540
@ $127.18 · 2026-02-20
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$868,156
@ $127.67 · 2026-02-12
GLENN ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$1.02M
@ $123.80 · 2025-11-19
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$100,520
@ $125.65 · 2025-11-18
TITONE BONNIE B.
Officer
$248,764
@ $124.38 · 2025-08-20
WEINTRAUB ALEXANDER J
Officer
$48,656
@ $121.64 · 2025-08-19
GILLESPIE THOMAS PRESTON JR.
Officer
$832,542
@ $124.26 · 2025-08-12
MCKEE E MARIE
Director
$201,057
@ $124.88 · 2025-08-07
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$198,378
@ $125.56 · 2025-08-07
GHARTEY-TAGOE KODWO
Officer
$1.05M
@ $117.10 · 2025-02-28
JANSON JULIA S.
Officer
$1.16M
@ $116.09 · 2025-02-26
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$542,969
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-18
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$44,592
@ $111.48 · 2024-11-15
GLENN ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$1.65M
@ $109.74 · 2024-11-15
JANSON JULIA S.
Officer
$1.13M
@ $112.58 · 2024-08-23
RENJEL LOUIS E
Officer
$61,366
@ $113.64 · 2024-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JPM
15
Sells (3M)
29
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $95.82M
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$1.64M
@ $300.27 · 2026-05-20
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.98M
@ $298.36 · 2026-05-15
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.70M
@ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$949,658
@ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.52M
@ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$935,032
@ $309.41 · 2026-05-05
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.26M
@ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$40.00M
@ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.80M
@ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$1.72M
@ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.32M
@ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.78M
@ $306.57 · 2026-04-15
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.74M
@ $306.58 · 2026-04-15
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$970,660
@ $306.59 · 2026-04-15
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$127,761
@ $295.06 · 2026-03-23
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$15.36M
@ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$132,684
@ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$886,157
@ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.07M
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$627,207
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$904,890
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.68M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.30M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.79M
@ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.09M
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$640,295
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$301,311
@ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.83M
@ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.39M
@ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.61M
@ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
LAKE MARIANNE
Officer
$3.28M
@ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$1.57M
@ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$2.71M
@ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.69M
@ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$3.29M
@ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.38M
@ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$10.03M
@ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.54M
@ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$31.50M
@ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$6.18M
@ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.06M
@ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$308,652
@ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$506,698
@ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$10.12M
@ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.15M
@ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$337,610
@ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$554,054
@ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$919,371
@ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.47M
@ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$971,646
@ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.81M
@ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DUK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JPM
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DUK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
JPM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
View DUK Full AnalysisView JPM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DUK vs JPM

Is Duke Energy Corporation or JPMorgan Chase & Co. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, JPM trades at a 34.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $498 vs. price $325), compared to DUK's -655.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $16 vs. $124).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Duke Energy Corporation or JPMorgan Chase & Co.?

JPM scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while DUK scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is JPMorgan Chase & Co. in financial distress?

JPM's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DUK scores 0.7 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Duke Energy Corporation or JPMorgan Chase & Co.?

JPM earns 4.5% ROIC versus DUK's 4.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Duke Energy Corporation's or JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s?

JPM's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to DUK's 63/100 (Safe). JPM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.