Compare StocksDUK vs INTC

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
$128.60
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

DUK
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $10.43 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    DUK
    • PEG ratio of 2.72 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.6x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.67 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    DUK
    INTC
    Valuation
    $-2.00B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    -2.00%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    20.38
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    17.95
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    4.89%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    9.26%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    51.90%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    2.72
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.72
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    5.58
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    3.31%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    DUK: 5Ties: 1INTC: 4
    DUKINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    DUK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    DUK
    $4.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.58B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$11.85B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    DUK
    828.0% Overvalued
    Price is 828.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $128.60
    Fair Value: $13.86
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    DUK

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    DUK
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    DUK
    -2.76
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    DUK
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 70.4%Retail & Other 29.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,918
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    DUK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    DUK
    6
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.21M
    GHARTEY-TAGOE KODWO
    Officer
    $2.40M
    @ $131.57 · 2026-03-02
    REPKO REGIS T
    Officer
    $86,853
    @ $131.00 · 2026-03-02
    REPKO REGIS T
    Officer
    $123,001
    @ $127.86 · 2026-02-24
    SAVOY BRIAN D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $127.69 · 2026-02-23
    REPKO REGIS T
    Officer
    $556,540
    @ $127.18 · 2026-02-20
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $868,156
    @ $127.67 · 2026-02-12
    GLENN ROBERT ALEXANDER
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $123.80 · 2025-11-19
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $100,520
    @ $125.65 · 2025-11-18
    TITONE BONNIE B.
    Officer
    $248,764
    @ $124.38 · 2025-08-20
    WEINTRAUB ALEXANDER J
    Officer
    $48,656
    @ $121.64 · 2025-08-19
    GILLESPIE THOMAS PRESTON JR.
    Officer
    $832,542
    @ $124.26 · 2025-08-12
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $198,378
    @ $125.56 · 2025-08-07
    MCKEE E MARIE
    Director
    $201,057
    @ $124.88 · 2025-08-07
    GHARTEY-TAGOE KODWO
    Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $117.10 · 2025-02-28
    JANSON JULIA S.
    Officer
    $1.16M
    @ $116.09 · 2025-02-26
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $542,969
    @ $111.49 · 2025-02-18
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $44,592
    @ $111.48 · 2024-11-15
    GLENN ROBERT ALEXANDER
    Officer
    $1.65M
    @ $109.74 · 2024-11-15
    JANSON JULIA S.
    Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $112.58 · 2024-08-23
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $61,366
    @ $113.64 · 2024-08-08
    GOOD LYNN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $103.30 · 2024-05-15
    MCKEE E MARIE
    Director
    $173,415
    @ $102.31 · 2024-05-14
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $123,432
    @ $102.86 · 2024-05-09
    JANSON JULIA S.
    Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $102.79 · 2024-05-09
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    DUK
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(62/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    DUK
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View DUK Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    DUK vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io