Compare Stocks › DRI vs UNH

Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, DRI is overvalued at $220, with a DCF intrinsic value of $188 and a margin of safety of -17%. UNH is overvalued at $407, with an intrinsic value of $367 and a margin of safety of -11%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$220.17
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$406.97

Rewards

DRI
  • ★Darden Restaurants, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Darden Restaurants, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
UNH
  • ★UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

DRI
  • ⚠Gross margin of 21.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.25 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠High leverage (4.05x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
UNH
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Gross margin of 20.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DRI
UNH
Valuation
$1.09B
Free Cash Flow
$26.50B
4.37%
FCF Yield
7.25%
21.38
Trailing P/E
23.23
17.76
Forward P/E
17.48
Quality & Moat
9.76%
ROIC
11.51%
55.43%
ROE
15.77%
21.66%
Gross Margin
20.05%
2.25
PEG Ratio
1.03
Balance Sheet Safety
4.05
Net Debt / Equity
0.43
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.91
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.58
2.94%
Dividend Yield
2.28%
DRI: 4Ties: 2UNH: 6
DRIUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DRI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DRI
$4.01
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.30B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.22B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DRI
17.3% Overvalued
Price is 17.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $220.17
Fair Value: $187.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
10.8% Overvalued
Price is 10.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $406.97
Fair Value: $367.30
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DRI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $220?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.5%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $407?

+14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.2%

The market implies +14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DRI
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DRI
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DRI
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 102.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,454
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.6%Retail & Other 10.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,333
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DRI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DRI
2
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $24.20M
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$447,565
@ $202.61 · 2026-10-06
WILKERSON JOHN W
Officer
$1.85M
@ $208.33 · 2026-08-05
KING SARAH H
Officer
$920,165
@ $210.42 · 2026-07-29
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$463,389
@ $208.17 · 2026-07-29
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $210.00 · 2026-07-29
CARDENAS RICARDO
Chief Executive Officer
$8.18M
@ $209.06 · 2026-07-28
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$2.05M
@ $206.21 · 2026-07-07
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$731,837
@ $202.16 · 2026-04-17
KOREN LINDSAY L
General Counsel
$58,295
@ $194.32 · 2026-04-07
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$998,040
@ $196.04 · 2026-04-06
SIMON WILLIAM S. JR.
Director
$468,082
@ $200.64 · 2026-03-23
SIMON WILLIAM S. JR.
Director
$475,839
@ $203.96 · 2026-03-23
SONSTEBY CHARLES M
Director
$641,210
@ $205.32 · 2026-01-23
KING SARAH H
Officer
$951,636
@ $206.65 · 2026-01-22
WILKERSON JOHN W
Officer
$480,954
@ $213.00 · 2026-01-16
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.45M
@ $214.12 · 2026-01-15
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$546,394
@ $207.36 · 2026-01-14
BURROWES TODD
Officer
$1.47M
@ $207.12 · 2026-01-13
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$236,964
@ $197.47 · 2026-01-06
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$313,786
@ $184.58 · 2025-10-14
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$1.09M
@ $193.40 · 2025-10-06
ATKINS MARGARET SHAN
Director
$223,411
@ $220.33 · 2025-07-01
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$1.68M
@ $218.05 · 2025-07-01
BURROWES TODD
Officer
$2.94M
@ $216.45 · 2025-06-30
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$2.67M
@ $218.71 · 2025-06-25
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$2.65M
@ $222.08 · 2025-06-24
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$1.06M
@ $223.78 · 2025-06-24
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $222.22 · 2025-06-24
SONSTEBY CHARLES M
Director
$1.64M
@ $204.56 · 2025-03-28
KING SARAH H
Officer
$1.80M
@ $207.27 · 2025-03-25
KIERNAN DANIEL J
Officer
$3.52M
@ $206.51 · 2025-03-25
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$1.06M
@ $208.69 · 2025-03-25
MADONNA JOHN W.
Officer
$375,434
@ $207.88 · 2025-03-24
CARDENAS RICARDO
Chief Executive Officer
$4.27M
@ $208.19 · 2025-03-24
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$1.55M
@ $195.95 · 2025-01-30
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$2.39M
@ $187.37 · 2025-01-21
ATKINS MARGARET SHAN
Director
$199,217
@ $181.11 · 2025-01-15
BURROWES TODD
Officer
$2.89M
@ $183.03 · 2025-01-14
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$1.71M
@ $184.68 · 2025-01-06
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$1.78M
@ $188.07 · 2024-12-26
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.31M
@ $181.71 · 2024-12-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $944,910
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$455,910
@ $390.00 · 2026-08-21
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$205,000
@ $410.00 · 2026-08-05
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DRI
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DRI
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
UNH
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View DRI Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DRI vs UNH

Is Darden Restaurants, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -10.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $367 vs. price $407), compared to DRI's -17.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $188 vs. $220).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Darden Restaurants, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?▼

DRI scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Darden Restaurants, Inc. in financial distress?▼

DRI's Altman Z-Score of 2.6 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UNH scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Darden Restaurants, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?▼

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 7.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s 4.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Darden Restaurants, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?▼

UNH earns 11.5% ROIC versus DRI's 9.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?▼

UNH's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to DRI's 69/100 (Safe). UNH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

DRI vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io