Compare StocksDRI vs TSLA

Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, DRI is fairly valued at $204, with a DCF intrinsic value of $188 and a margin of safety of -8%. TSLA is overvalued at $311, with an intrinsic value of $143 and a margin of safety of -118%. Of the two, DRI has the wider margin of safety.

DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$203.58
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$311.21

Rewards

DRI
  • Darden Restaurants, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Darden Restaurants, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
TSLA
  • Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.6x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

DRI
  • Gross margin of 21.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • High leverage (3.55x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $13.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
TSLA
  • ROIC has declined by 21.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DRI
TSLA
Valuation
$1.09B
Free Cash Flow
$4.84B
4.67%
FCF Yield
0.39%
19.50
Trailing P/E
285.51
16.44
Forward P/E
140.23
Quality & Moat
14.39%
ROIC
1.11%
53.72%
ROE
4.67%
21.67%
Gross Margin
18.85%
1.82
PEG Ratio
4.56
Balance Sheet Safety
3.55
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.70
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.55
3.01%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
DRI: 8Ties: 1TSLA: 3
DRITSLA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DRI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TSLA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DRI
$2.63
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.30B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.43B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TSLA
$50.04
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.92B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.30T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DRI
8.2% Overvalued
Price is 8.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $203.58
Fair Value: $188.15
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TSLA
425.3% Overvalued
Price is 425.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $311.21
Fair Value: $59.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DRI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $204?

+11.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.6%

The market implies +11.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TSLA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $311?

+47.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +43.3%

The market implies +47.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +43.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DRI
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TSLA
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DRI
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TSLA
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DRI
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 99.7%Retail & Other 0.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,411
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TSLA
Insiders 17.8%Institutions 42.7%Retail & Other 39.5%
No. of Institutional Holders5,241
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DRI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TSLA
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $999.96M
MUSK ELON REEVE
Chief Executive Officer
$999.96M
@ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
GEBBIA JOSEPH
Director
$1.03M
@ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DRI
5
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $23.31M
KING SARAH H
Officer
$920,165
@ $210.42 · 2026-07-29
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$463,389
@ $208.17 · 2026-07-29
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $210.00 · 2026-07-29
CARDENAS RICARDO
Chief Executive Officer
$8.18M
@ $209.06 · 2026-07-28
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$2.05M
@ $206.21 · 2026-07-07
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$731,837
@ $202.16 · 2026-04-17
KOREN LINDSAY L
General Counsel
$58,295
@ $194.32 · 2026-04-07
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$998,040
@ $196.04 · 2026-04-06
SIMON WILLIAM S. JR.
Director
$468,082
@ $200.64 · 2026-03-23
SIMON WILLIAM S. JR.
Director
$475,839
@ $203.96 · 2026-03-23
SONSTEBY CHARLES M
Director
$641,210
@ $205.32 · 2026-01-23
KING SARAH H
Officer
$951,636
@ $206.65 · 2026-01-22
WILKERSON JOHN W
Officer
$480,954
@ $213.00 · 2026-01-16
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.45M
@ $214.12 · 2026-01-15
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$546,394
@ $207.36 · 2026-01-14
BURROWES TODD
Officer
$1.47M
@ $207.12 · 2026-01-13
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$236,964
@ $197.47 · 2026-01-06
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$313,786
@ $184.58 · 2025-10-14
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$1.09M
@ $193.40 · 2025-10-06
ATKINS MARGARET SHAN
Director
$223,411
@ $220.33 · 2025-07-01
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$1.68M
@ $218.05 · 2025-07-01
BURROWES TODD
Officer
$2.94M
@ $216.45 · 2025-06-30
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$2.67M
@ $218.71 · 2025-06-25
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$2.65M
@ $222.08 · 2025-06-24
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$1.06M
@ $223.78 · 2025-06-24
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $222.22 · 2025-06-24
SONSTEBY CHARLES M
Director
$1.64M
@ $204.56 · 2025-03-28
KING SARAH H
Officer
$1.80M
@ $207.27 · 2025-03-25
KIERNAN DANIEL J
Officer
$3.52M
@ $206.51 · 2025-03-25
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$1.06M
@ $208.69 · 2025-03-25
CARDENAS RICARDO
Chief Executive Officer
$4.27M
@ $208.19 · 2025-03-24
MADONNA JOHN W.
Officer
$375,434
@ $207.88 · 2025-03-24
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$1.55M
@ $195.95 · 2025-01-30
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$2.39M
@ $187.37 · 2025-01-21
ATKINS MARGARET SHAN
Director
$199,217
@ $181.11 · 2025-01-15
BURROWES TODD
Officer
$2.89M
@ $183.03 · 2025-01-14
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$1.71M
@ $184.68 · 2025-01-06
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$1.78M
@ $188.07 · 2024-12-26
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.31M
@ $181.71 · 2024-12-23
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$489,895
@ $163.30 · 2024-10-04
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$542,576
@ $163.43 · 2024-10-01
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$334,453
@ $167.23 · 2024-09-27
WILLIAMSON LAURA B
Officer
$1.11M
@ $173.07 · 2024-09-24
MADONNA JOHN W.
Officer
$818,960
@ $172.96 · 2024-09-24
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$981,496
@ $172.04 · 2024-09-23
KIERNAN DANIEL J
Officer
$3.55M
@ $171.90 · 2024-09-23
CARDENAS RICARDO
Chief Executive Officer
$7.28M
@ $171.68 · 2024-09-23
MENSAH NANA
Director
$201,292
@ $171.90 · 2024-09-23
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$749,824
@ $171.98 · 2024-09-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TSLA
2
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $60.94M
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $402.27 · 2026-06-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.35M
@ $450.00 · 2026-05-13
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$9.99M
@ $378.11 · 2026-04-30
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$9.27M
@ $359.33 · 2026-03-30
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$899,077
@ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$10.69M
@ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$25.61M
@ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.17M
@ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$918,137
@ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.77M
@ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$4.86M
@ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$732,573
@ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
Director
$170.64M
@ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$32.73M
@ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.20M
@ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$30.81M
@ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.14M
@ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$32.10M
@ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
Director
$13.19M
@ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$718,111
@ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$33.67M
@ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$27.59M
@ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$43.16M
@ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$41.16M
@ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$975,015
@ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$35.25M
@ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$39.79M
@ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.48M
@ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$35.34M
@ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$34.60M
@ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.01M
@ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$15.14M
@ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$65,867
@ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DRI
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TSLA
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DRI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
TSLA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View DRI Full AnalysisView TSLA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DRI vs TSLA

Is Darden Restaurants, Inc. or Tesla, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DRI trades at a -8.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $188 vs. price $204), compared to TSLA's -117.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $143 vs. $311).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Darden Restaurants, Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?

DRI scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while TSLA scores 31/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Darden Restaurants, Inc. in financial distress?

DRI's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TSLA scores 19.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Darden Restaurants, Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?

Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) generates a 4.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Tesla, Inc.'s 0.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Darden Restaurants, Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?

DRI earns 14.4% ROIC versus TSLA's 1.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

DRI vs TSLA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io