Compare StocksDRI vs PFE

Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, DRI is overvalued at $213, with a DCF intrinsic value of $120 and a margin of safety of -77%. PFE is overvalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$213.45
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$25.21

Rewards

DRI
  • Darden Restaurants, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Darden Restaurants, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.2x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

DRI
  • Gross margin of 21.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • High leverage (3.76x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $2.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 13.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DRI
PFE
Valuation
$1.03B
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
4.20%
FCF Yield
8.61%
22.49
Trailing P/E
19.24
18.76
Forward P/E
8.91
Quality & Moat
12.93%
ROIC
10.19%
51.54%
ROE
8.31%
21.51%
Gross Margin
74.80%
1.83
PEG Ratio
13.77
Balance Sheet Safety
3.76
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.94
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
2.87%
Dividend Yield
6.61%
DRI: 3Ties: 1PFE: 8
DRIPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DRI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DRI
$3.71
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.18B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.39B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DRI
77.2% Overvalued
Price is 77.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $213.45
Fair Value: $120.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
12.3% Overvalued
Price is 12.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.21
Fair Value: $22.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DRI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $213?

+13.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.9%

The market implies +13.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

+5.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DRI
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DRI
-2.72
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DRI
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 99.6%Retail & Other 0.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,389
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 30.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,744
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DRI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DRI
5
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $22.42M
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$731,837
@ $202.16 · 2026-04-17
KOREN LINDSAY L
General Counsel
$58,295
@ $194.32 · 2026-04-07
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$998,040
@ $196.04 · 2026-04-06
SIMON WILLIAM S. JR.
Director
$468,082
@ $200.64 · 2026-03-23
SIMON WILLIAM S. JR.
Director
$475,839
@ $203.96 · 2026-03-23
SONSTEBY CHARLES M
Director
$641,210
@ $205.32 · 2026-01-23
KING SARAH H
Officer
$951,636
@ $206.65 · 2026-01-22
WILKERSON JOHN
Officer
$480,954
@ $213.00 · 2026-01-16
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.45M
@ $214.12 · 2026-01-15
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$546,394
@ $207.36 · 2026-01-14
BURROWES TODD
Officer
$1.47M
@ $207.12 · 2026-01-13
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$236,964
@ $197.47 · 2026-01-06
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$313,786
@ $184.58 · 2025-10-14
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$1.09M
@ $193.40 · 2025-10-06
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$1.68M
@ $218.05 · 2025-07-01
ATKINS MARGARET SHAN
Director
$223,411
@ $220.33 · 2025-07-01
BURROWES TODD
Officer
$2.94M
@ $216.45 · 2025-06-30
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$2.67M
@ $218.71 · 2025-06-25
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$1.06M
@ $223.78 · 2025-06-24
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $222.22 · 2025-06-24
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$2.65M
@ $222.08 · 2025-06-24
SONSTEBY CHARLES M
Director
$1.64M
@ $204.56 · 2025-03-28
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$1.06M
@ $208.69 · 2025-03-25
KING SARAH H
Officer
$1.80M
@ $207.27 · 2025-03-25
KIERNAN DANIEL J
Officer
$3.52M
@ $206.51 · 2025-03-25
CARDENAS RICARDO
Chief Executive Officer
$4.27M
@ $208.19 · 2025-03-24
MADONNA JOHN W.
Officer
$375,434
@ $207.88 · 2025-03-24
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$1.55M
@ $195.95 · 2025-01-30
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$2.39M
@ $187.37 · 2025-01-21
ATKINS MARGARET SHAN
Director
$199,217
@ $181.11 · 2025-01-15
BURROWES TODD
Officer
$2.89M
@ $183.03 · 2025-01-14
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$1.71M
@ $184.68 · 2025-01-06
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$1.78M
@ $188.07 · 2024-12-26
VENNAM RAJESH
Chief Financial Officer
$1.31M
@ $181.71 · 2024-12-23
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$489,895
@ $163.30 · 2024-10-04
CONNELLY SUSAN M.
Officer
$542,576
@ $163.43 · 2024-10-01
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$334,453
@ $167.23 · 2024-09-27
WILLIAMSON LAURA B
Officer
$1.11M
@ $173.07 · 2024-09-24
MADONNA JOHN W.
Officer
$818,960
@ $172.96 · 2024-09-24
CARDENAS RICARDO
Chief Executive Officer
$7.28M
@ $171.68 · 2024-09-23
MILANES DOUGLAS J
Officer
$981,496
@ $172.04 · 2024-09-23
KIERNAN DANIEL J
Officer
$3.55M
@ $171.90 · 2024-09-23
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$749,824
@ $171.98 · 2024-09-23
MENSAH NANA
Director
$201,292
@ $171.90 · 2024-09-23
KING SARAH H
Officer
$2.34M
@ $147.06 · 2024-07-30
BROAD MATTHEW R
General Counsel
$757,428
@ $146.48 · 2024-07-29
MARTIN MELVIN JOHN
Officer
$352,727
@ $141.09 · 2024-07-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DRI
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DRI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View DRI Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DRI vs PFE

Is Darden Restaurants, Inc. or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a -12.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $22 vs. price $25), compared to DRI's -77.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $120 vs. $213).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Darden Restaurants, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?

DRI scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DRI scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Darden Restaurants, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 8.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s 4.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Darden Restaurants, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?

DRI earns 12.9% ROIC versus PFE's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s or Pfizer Inc.'s?

DRI's dividend earns a safety score of 69/100 (Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). DRI has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.