Compare StocksDPZ vs QCOM

Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, DPZ is overvalued at $312, with a DCF intrinsic value of $273 and a margin of safety of -14%. QCOM is overvalued at $226, with an intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. Of the two, DPZ has the wider margin of safety.

DPZ
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
$312.47
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11

Rewards

DPZ
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

DPZ
  • FCF yield of 5.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.8x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • 10 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DPZ
QCOM
Valuation
$524.71M
Free Cash Flow
$12.82B
5.05%
FCF Yield
5.38%
17.99
Trailing P/E
24.34
14.92
Forward P/E
21.20
Quality & Moat
14.81%
ROIC
18.22%
N/A
ROE
36.08%
28.70%
Gross Margin
54.80%
1.56
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.20
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.80
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.42
2.48%
Dividend Yield
1.72%
DPZ: 3Ties: 1QCOM: 6
DPZQCOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DPZ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DPZ
$1.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.09B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.75B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DPZ
14.3% Overvalued
Price is 14.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $312.47
Fair Value: $273.37
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
178.3% Overvalued
Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.11
Fair Value: $81.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DPZ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $312?

+11.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.8%

The market implies +11.0% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +12.8%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

+17.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DPZ
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DPZ
-3.03
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DPZ
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 112.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,139
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DPZ
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DPZ
3
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.24M
GARCIA KELLY E
Officer
$151,817
@ $311.74 · 2026-06-11
GARCIA KELLY E
Officer
$152,822
@ $313.16 · 2026-05-21
GARCIA KELLY E
Chief Technology Officer
$162,167
@ $332.31 · 2026-04-30
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$220,823
@ $394.33 · 2026-03-13
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$292,617
@ $396.50 · 2026-03-13
PARRISH JESSICA L
Officer
$37,045
@ $394.10 · 2026-03-13
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$1.18M
@ $399.60 · 2026-03-11
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$697,302
@ $399.60 · 2026-03-11
PARRISH JESSICA L
Officer
$228,172
@ $399.60 · 2026-03-11
GARCIA KELLY E
Officer
$2.11M
@ $434.06 · 2025-12-16
BALLARD CHARLES ANDREW
Director
$199,651
@ $483.42 · 2025-05-01
GOLDMAN JAMES A
Director
$186,645
@ $484.79 · 2025-04-30
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$184,410
@ $462.18 · 2025-04-02
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$109,800
@ $450.00 · 2025-03-17
MORRIS KEVIN SCOTT
General Counsel
$2.37M
@ $437.00 · 2025-03-13
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$109,691
@ $433.56 · 2025-03-12
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$384,568
@ $433.56 · 2025-03-12
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$477,326
@ $443.20 · 2025-03-11
GARCIA KELLY E
Chief Technology Officer
$917,923
@ $436.28 · 2025-03-11
BALSON ANDREW B
Director
$2.95M
@ $492.46 · 2025-03-03
MORRIS KEVIN SCOTT
General Counsel
$1.21M
@ $459.00 · 2024-11-15
CANTOR DIANA F
Director
$1.37M
@ $455.53 · 2024-11-11
MORRIS KEVIN SCOTT
General Counsel
$91,800
@ $459.00 · 2024-11-11
GOLDMAN JAMES A
Director
$228,330
@ $430.00 · 2024-11-04
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$150,500
@ $430.00 · 2024-11-01
BALSON ANDREW B
Director
$2.99M
@ $428.27 · 2024-10-15
BALLARD CHARLES ANDREW
Director
$95,453
@ $446.04 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.65M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DPZ
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DPZ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
View DPZ Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DPZ vs QCOM

Is Domino's Pizza, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DPZ trades at a -14.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $273 vs. price $312), compared to QCOM's -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $128 vs. $226).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Domino's Pizza, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

DPZ scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Domino's Pizza, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Domino's Pizza, Inc.'s 5.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Domino's Pizza, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus DPZ's 14.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Domino's Pizza, Inc.'s or QUALCOMM Incorporated's?

DPZ's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). DPZ has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

DPZ vs QCOM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io