Compare Stocks › DPZ vs MS
Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) vs Morgan Stanley (MS)
DPZ
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
$375.30
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$158.55
Rewards
DPZ
- ★Domino's Pizza, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
- ★Domino's Pizza, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
- ★Free cash flow has grown at a 20.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
MS
- ★Gross margin of 87.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.65 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
- ★PEG ratio of 0.75 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
Risks
DPZ
- ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
- ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
- ⚠6 insider sales totaling $2.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
MS
- ⚠High leverage (4.56x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
- ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
- ⚠7 insider sales totaling $25.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →DPZ
MS
Valuation
$671.50M
Free Cash Flow
N/A
5.32%
FCF Yield
N/A
21.37
Trailing P/E
15.53
17.44
Forward P/E
12.89
Quality & Moat
13.30%
ROIC
3.43%
N/A
ROE
14.42%
28.63%
Gross Margin
87.06%
0.71
PEG Ratio
0.75
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
4.56
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.96
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.12%
Dividend Yield
2.52%
DPZ: 2Ties: 1MS: 4
DPZMS
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →DPZ
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
MS
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →DPZ
$1.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.09B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.75B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →DPZ
49.2% Overvalued
Price is 49.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $375.30
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $251.60
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
45.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 45.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $158.55
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $290.92
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →DPZ
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $375?
+12.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.4%
The market implies +12.9% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.
Standard FCF implies +11.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.
MS
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →DPZ
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
32/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →DPZ
-3.03
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →DPZ
Insiders 10.4%Institutions 92.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,124
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.0%Institutions 62.7%Retail & Other 13.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,182
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →DPZ
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →DPZ
6
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.34M
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$292,617
@ $396.50 · 2026-03-13
PARRISH JESSICA L
Officer
$37,045
@ $394.10 · 2026-03-13
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$220,823
@ $394.33 · 2026-03-13
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$697,302
@ $399.60 · 2026-03-11
PARRISH JESSICA L
Officer
$228,172
@ $399.60 · 2026-03-11
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$1.18M
@ $399.60 · 2026-03-11
GARCIA KELLY E
Officer
$2.11M
@ $434.06 · 2025-12-16
BALLARD CHARLES ANDREW
Director
$199,651
@ $483.42 · 2025-05-01
GOLDMAN JAMES A
Director
$186,645
@ $484.79 · 2025-04-30
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$184,410
@ $462.18 · 2025-04-02
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$109,800
@ $450.00 · 2025-03-17
MORRIS KEVIN SCOTT
General Counsel
$2.37M
@ $437.00 · 2025-03-13
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$384,568
@ $433.56 · 2025-03-12
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$109,691
@ $433.56 · 2025-03-12
GARCIA KELLY E
Chief Technology Officer
$917,923
@ $436.28 · 2025-03-11
REDDY SANDEEP
Chief Financial Officer
$477,326
@ $443.20 · 2025-03-11
BALSON ANDREW B
Director
$2.95M
@ $492.46 · 2025-03-03
MORRIS KEVIN SCOTT
General Counsel
$1.21M
@ $459.00 · 2024-11-15
MORRIS KEVIN SCOTT
General Counsel
$91,800
@ $459.00 · 2024-11-11
CANTOR DIANA F
Director
$1.37M
@ $455.53 · 2024-11-11
GOLDMAN JAMES A
Director
$228,330
@ $430.00 · 2024-11-04
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$150,500
@ $430.00 · 2024-11-01
BALSON ANDREW B
Director
$2.99M
@ $428.27 · 2024-10-15
BALLARD CHARLES ANDREW
Director
$95,453
@ $446.04 · 2024-08-15
GARCIA KELLY E
Chief Technology Officer
$1.15M
@ $523.00 · 2024-06-03
PARRISH JESSICA L
Vice President
$209,672
@ $524.18 · 2024-05-01
GARRIDO FRANK
Officer
$245,080
@ $521.45 · 2024-05-01
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$395,074
@ $530.30 · 2024-04-29
WEINER RUSSELL J
Chief Executive Officer
$6.20M
@ $526.37 · 2024-04-29
HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
Officer
$53,469
@ $495.08 · 2024-04-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
7
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $62.45M
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$692,663
@ $99.61 · 2024-05-14
GORMAN JAMES P
Officer and Director
$9.02M
@ $90.21 · 2024-04-18
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.01M
@ $90.09 · 2024-04-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →DPZ
😨Fear(33/100)
"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
😐Neutral(48/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →DPZ
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
MS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)