Compare StocksDPZ vs INTC

Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

DPZ
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
$330.42
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$95.78

Rewards

DPZ
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
INTC

    Risks

    DPZ
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.8x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $2.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    INTC
    Valuation
    $524.71M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    4.77%
    FCF Yield
    -1.72%
    19.03
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    15.74
    Forward P/E
    64.22
    Quality & Moat
    14.81%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    N/A
    ROE
    -0.21%
    28.70%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    1.54
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.80
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    2.36%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    DPZ: 4Ties: 1INTC: 3
    DPZINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    DPZ

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    $1.61
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.09B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.75B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    21.7% Overvalued
    Price is 21.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $330.42
    Fair Value: $271.41
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $95.78
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    DPZ

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $330?

    +11.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.3%

    The market implies +11.5% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +13.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    91/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    -3.03
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    Insiders 10.5%Institutions 94.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,125
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    6
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.77M
    HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
    Officer
    $292,617
    @ $396.50 · 2026-03-13
    PARRISH JESSICA L
    Officer
    $37,045
    @ $394.10 · 2026-03-13
    REDDY SANDEEP
    Chief Financial Officer
    $220,823
    @ $394.33 · 2026-03-13
    HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
    Officer
    $697,302
    @ $399.60 · 2026-03-11
    PARRISH JESSICA L
    Officer
    $228,172
    @ $399.60 · 2026-03-11
    REDDY SANDEEP
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $399.60 · 2026-03-11
    GARCIA KELLY E
    Officer
    $2.11M
    @ $434.06 · 2025-12-16
    BALLARD CHARLES ANDREW
    Director
    $199,651
    @ $483.42 · 2025-05-01
    GOLDMAN JAMES A
    Director
    $186,645
    @ $484.79 · 2025-04-30
    REDDY SANDEEP
    Chief Financial Officer
    $184,410
    @ $462.18 · 2025-04-02
    HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
    Officer
    $109,800
    @ $450.00 · 2025-03-17
    MORRIS KEVIN SCOTT
    General Counsel
    $2.37M
    @ $437.00 · 2025-03-13
    HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
    Officer
    $384,568
    @ $433.56 · 2025-03-12
    REDDY SANDEEP
    Chief Financial Officer
    $109,691
    @ $433.56 · 2025-03-12
    GARCIA KELLY E
    Chief Technology Officer
    $917,923
    @ $436.28 · 2025-03-11
    REDDY SANDEEP
    Chief Financial Officer
    $477,326
    @ $443.20 · 2025-03-11
    BALSON ANDREW B
    Director
    $2.95M
    @ $492.46 · 2025-03-03
    MORRIS KEVIN SCOTT
    General Counsel
    $1.21M
    @ $459.00 · 2024-11-15
    MORRIS KEVIN SCOTT
    General Counsel
    $91,800
    @ $459.00 · 2024-11-11
    CANTOR DIANA F
    Director
    $1.37M
    @ $455.53 · 2024-11-11
    GOLDMAN JAMES A
    Director
    $228,330
    @ $430.00 · 2024-11-04
    HEADEN CYNTHIA A.
    Officer
    $150,500
    @ $430.00 · 2024-11-01
    BALSON ANDREW B
    Director
    $2.99M
    @ $428.27 · 2024-10-15
    BALLARD CHARLES ANDREW
    Director
    $95,453
    @ $446.04 · 2024-08-15
    GARCIA KELLY E
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $523.00 · 2024-06-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(71/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    DPZ
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
    View DPZ Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    DPZ vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io