Compare StocksDOC vs INTC

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (DOC) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, DOC is overvalued at $22, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. INTC is overvalued at $90, with an intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1271%. Of the two, DOC has the wider margin of safety.

DOC
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
$21.83
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.20

Rewards

DOC
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
INTC

    Risks

    DOC
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • PEG ratio of 4.32 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    DOC
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.11B
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.87B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    1.07%
    68.22
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    -145.53
    Forward P/E
    44.27
    Quality & Moat
    1.41%
    ROIC
    3.57%
    2.80%
    ROE
    -10.71%
    58.33%
    Gross Margin
    38.87%
    4.32
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.05
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.20
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    6.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.24
    5.59%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    DOC: 4Ties: 1INTC: 5
    DOCINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    DOC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    DOC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-1.68B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-8.99
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    DOC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $21.83
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $90.20
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    DOC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $22?

    +34.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -4.0%

    The market implies +34.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding -4.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $90?

    +29.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    DOC
    57/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    DOC
    -2.75
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    DOC
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 101.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,045
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,881
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    DOC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $49,807
    THOMAS JOHN T
    Director
    $24,730
    @ $17.06 · 2025-08-06
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $25,077
    @ $16.83 · 2025-08-04
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $49,986
    @ $17.06 · 2025-07-31
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $49,990
    @ $17.40 · 2025-07-28
    THOMPSON TOMMY G
    Director
    $99,769
    @ $17.27 · 2025-05-28
    THOMPSON TOMMY G
    Director
    $98,974
    @ $17.36 · 2025-05-09
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $47,822
    @ $17.39 · 2025-05-09
    LIAS-BOOKER AVA E.
    Director
    $89,150
    @ $17.83 · 2025-04-29
    SHELLEY-KESSLER PAMELA J
    Director
    $49,991
    @ $17.61 · 2025-04-28
    THOMAS JOHN T
    Director
    $74,928
    @ $17.84 · 2025-04-28
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $200,438
    @ $17.68 · 2025-04-28
    SANDSTROM KATHERINE M
    Director
    $199,233
    @ $17.65 · 2025-04-28
    LEWIS SARA GROOTWASSINK
    Director
    $105,938
    @ $17.66 · 2025-04-28
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    DOC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $213,740
    BOHN SCOTT R
    Officer
    $213,740
    @ $19.45 · 2026-05-12
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    DOC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(62/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    DOC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View DOC Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: DOC vs INTC

    Is Healthpeak Properties, Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, DOC trades at a -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $0 vs. price $22), compared to INTC's -1270.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $90).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Healthpeak Properties, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    DOC scores 57/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Healthpeak Properties, Inc. in financial distress?

    DOC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Healthpeak Properties, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    INTC earns 3.6% ROIC versus DOC's 1.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    DOC vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io