Compare StocksDOC vs INTC

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (DOC) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

DOC
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
$17.73
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

DOC
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • 13 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
  • FCF yield of 9.4% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
INTC

    Risks

    DOC
    • Trailing P/E of 177.3x is 154% above the historical average of 69.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.75 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    DOC
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    9.43%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    177.30
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    88.65
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    2.43%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    0.85%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    59.97%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    0.07
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.22
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    6.22
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    6.88%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    DOC: 5Ties: 1INTC: 3
    DOCINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    DOC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    DOC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-1.68B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-2.53B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    DOC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $17.73
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    DOC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $18?

    +46.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +7.0%

    The market implies +46.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    DOC
    44/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    DOC
    -2.75
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    DOC
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 97.8%Retail & Other 2.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,072
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    DOC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    13
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.12M
    THOMAS JOHN T
    Director
    $24,730
    @ $17.06 · 2025-08-06
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $25,077
    @ $16.83 · 2025-08-04
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $49,986
    @ $17.06 · 2025-07-31
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $49,990
    @ $17.40 · 2025-07-28
    THOMPSON TOMMY G
    Director
    $99,769
    @ $17.27 · 2025-05-28
    THOMPSON TOMMY G
    Director
    $98,974
    @ $17.36 · 2025-05-09
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $47,822
    @ $17.39 · 2025-05-09
    LIAS-BOOKER AVA E.
    Director
    $89,150
    @ $17.83 · 2025-04-29
    SHELLEY-KESSLER PAMELA J
    Director
    $49,991
    @ $17.61 · 2025-04-28
    THOMAS JOHN T
    Director
    $74,928
    @ $17.84 · 2025-04-28
    BRINKER SCOTT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $200,438
    @ $17.68 · 2025-04-28
    SANDSTROM KATHERINE M
    Director
    $199,233
    @ $17.65 · 2025-04-28
    LEWIS SARA GROOTWASSINK
    Director
    $105,938
    @ $17.66 · 2025-04-28
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    DOC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    DOC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(50/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    DOC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View DOC Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (DOC) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io