Compare StocksDLTR vs GS

Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR) vs Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, DLTR is fairly valued at $131, with a DCF intrinsic value of $130 and a margin of safety of -0%. GS is undervalued at $1018, with an intrinsic value of $481431875452 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

DLTR
Dollar Tree, Inc.
$130.65
VS
GS
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)
$1018.16

Rewards

DLTR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 13.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Altman Z-Score of 3.86 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
GS
  • Gross margin of 82.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

DLTR
  • FCF yield of 5.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • High leverage (1.88x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
GS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.16 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $20.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DLTR
GS
Valuation
$1.44B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
5.75%
FCF Yield
N/A
20.97
Trailing P/E
15.72
17.00
Forward P/E
13.80
Quality & Moat
12.77%
ROIC
2.46%
33.98%
ROE
16.95%
36.99%
Gross Margin
82.08%
1.59
PEG Ratio
1.45
Balance Sheet Safety
1.88
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.74
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.96%
DLTR: 2Ties: 1GS: 6
DLTRGS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DLTR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DLTR
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-2.75B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.49B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GS
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$535.62
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DLTR
0.1% Overvalued
Price is 0.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $130.65
Fair Value: $130.49
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GS
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $1018.16
Fair Value: $481431875452.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DLTR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $131?

+10.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.0%
GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DLTR
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DLTR

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DLTR
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 105.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,211
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GS
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 74.8%Retail & Other 24.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,873
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DLTR
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $342,130
GLENDINNING STEWART F
Chief Financial Officer
$342,130
@ $97.75 · 2025-09-08
MAHESHWARI ADITYA
Officer
$59,899
@ $98.20 · 2025-06-18
GLENDINNING STEWART F
Chief Financial Officer
$1.24M
@ $72.75 · 2025-04-15
DOUGLAS WILLIAM W III
Director
$520,822
@ $69.44 · 2025-04-03
HEINRICH DANIEL J
Director
$150,194
@ $68.27 · 2024-09-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
FLAHERTY MARK A
Director
$29,545
@ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DLTR
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $535,392
AFLATOONI ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$22,956
@ $131.18 · 2026-01-07
BEEBE BRENT A
Officer
$274,230
@ $124.65 · 2025-12-08
AFLATOONI ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$119,328
@ $94.70 · 2025-10-17
STAHL STEPHANIE P
Director
$118,878
@ $100.32 · 2025-09-05
AFLATOONI ROBERT
Chief Technology Officer
$17,070
@ $97.54 · 2025-06-20
MCNEELY RICHARD L.
Officer
$1.99M
@ $94.62 · 2025-06-06
MAHESHWARI ADITYA
Officer
$92,485
@ $74.71 · 2025-04-14
LEIKEN JONATHAN B
Officer
$13,374
@ $75.56 · 2025-04-01
CREEDON MICHAEL C JR
Chief Executive Officer
$31,162
@ $75.45 · 2025-04-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GS
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $78.42M
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$287,951
@ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DLTR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DLTR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
GS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View DLTR Full AnalysisView GS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DLTR vs GS

Is Dollar Tree, Inc. or Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $481431875452 vs. price $1018), compared to DLTR's -0.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $130 vs. $131).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Dollar Tree, Inc. or Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)?

DLTR scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) in financial distress?

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DLTR scores 3.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Dollar Tree, Inc. or Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)?

DLTR earns 12.8% ROIC versus GS's 2.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.