Compare Stocks › DIS vs PG

Walt Disney Company (The) (DIS) vs Procter & Gamble Company (The) (PG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, DIS is undervalued at $96, with a DCF intrinsic value of $254584003147 and a margin of safety of 100%. PG is undervalued at $144, with an intrinsic value of $220753045647 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, DIS has the wider margin of safety.

DIS

Walt Disney Company (The)

$96.19

Procter & Gamble Company (The)

$144.49

Rewards

DIS

★Free cash flow has grown at a 111.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.06 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
★Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 2 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

★Procter & Gamble Company (The) has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
★Procter & Gamble Company (The) scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

DIS

⚠PEG ratio of 2.24 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
⚠Altman Z-Score of 1.08 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

⚠PEG ratio of 5.57 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
⚠28 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →

DIS

Valuation

$10.08B

Free Cash Flow

$12.84B

0.00%

FCF Yield

N/A

15.39

Trailing P/E

21.83

12.90

Forward P/E

19.50

Quality & Moat

7.33%

ROIC

15.19%

11.01%

ROE

30.29%

37.16%

Gross Margin

50.68%

2.24

PEG Ratio

5.57

Balance Sheet Safety

0.36

Net Debt / Equity

0.45

N/A

Interest Coverage

N/A

2.11

Net Debt / EBITDA

1.02

1.56%

Dividend Yield

3.01%

DIS: 4Ties: 1PG: 6

DISPG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →

DIS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →

DIS

$0.00

created per $1 retained over 3 years

Value Destroyer

Σ Retained

$16.56B

Δ Market Cap

+$26.89

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

$-0.00

created per $1 retained over 3 years

Market Cap Declined

Σ Retained

$17.32B

Δ Market Cap

$-8.25

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →

DIS

100.0% Margin of Safety

Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value

Current Price: $96.19

Strongly undervalued

Fairly valued

Strongly overvalued

Fair Value: $254584003146.76

Strongly undervalued

Undervalued

Fairly valued

Overvalued

Strongly overvalued

100.0% Margin of Safety

Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value

Current Price: $144.49

Strongly undervalued

Fairly valued

Strongly overvalued

Fair Value: $220753045647.21

Strongly undervalued

Undervalued

Fairly valued

Overvalued

Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →

DIS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $96?

-18.7%

Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth

Standard FCF implies -15.2%

The market implies -18.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -15.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $144?

-29.9%

Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →

DIS

51/100

Narrow Moat

70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

94/100

Wide Moat

70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →

DIS

-2.61

Unlikely Manipulator

Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

-2.54

Unlikely Manipulator

Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →

DIS

Insiders 0.1%Institutions 77.8%Retail & Other 22.2%

No. of Institutional Holders3,833

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insiders 0.1%Institutions 71.8%Retail & Other 28.2%

No. of Institutional Holders4,993

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →

DIS

Buys (3M)

Buys (12M)

Total value (12M): $2.11M

CHANG AMY L

Director

$98,791

@ $107.85 · 2026-02-12

GORMAN JAMES P

Director

$2.01M

@ $111.89 · 2025-12-12

MCDONALD CALVIN

Director

$999,994

@ $85.06 · 2024-08-08

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Buys (3M)

Buys (12M)

No open market insider purchases found.

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →

DIS

Sells (3M)

Sells (12M)

Total value (12M): $792,757

COLEMAN SONIA L

Officer

$281,922

@ $114.00 · 2026-01-22

COLEMAN SONIA L

Officer

$277,134

@ $114.00 · 2025-12-24

COLEMAN SONIA L

Officer

$233,701

@ $118.57 · 2025-08-25

WOODFORD BRENT A

Officer

$110,845

@ $110.84 · 2025-05-13

COLEMAN SONIA L

Officer

$74,936

@ $108.76 · 2025-01-22

COLEMAN SONIA L

Officer

$342,766

@ $111.36 · 2024-12-17

WOODFORD BRENT A

Officer

$917,920

@ $114.74 · 2024-12-11

IGER ROBERT A

Chief Executive Officer

$42.67M

@ $114.57 · 2024-11-22

WOODFORD BRENT A

Officer

$568,101

@ $113.62 · 2024-11-20

COLEMAN SONIA L

Officer

$279,772

@ $99.99 · 2024-11-11

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Sells (3M)

Sells (12M)

Total value (12M): $78.99M

FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA

Officer

$917,199

@ $165.29 · 2026-02-27

WHALEY SUSAN STREET

Officer

$288,454

@ $159.45 · 2026-02-19

AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER

Officer

$2.46M

@ $162.28 · 2026-02-13

COOMBE GARY A

Officer

$5.86M

@ $162.33 · 2026-02-12

MOELLER JON R

Officer and Director

$28.12M

@ $162.29 · 2026-02-12

PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI

Officer

$2.06M

@ $160.31 · 2026-02-11

FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA

Officer

$1.26M

@ $158.00 · 2026-02-04

PRITCHARD MARC S

Officer

$14.50M

@ $151.15 · 2026-01-23

JANZARUK MATTHEW W.

Officer

$108,438

@ $149.57 · 2025-10-30

COOMBE GARY A

Officer

$538,139

@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02

MOELLER JON R

Chief Executive Officer

$1.78M

@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02

DAVIS JENNIFER L

Officer

$491,252

@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02

PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI

Officer

$74,594

@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02

WHALEY SUSAN STREET

Officer

$366,574

@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02

JEJURIKAR SHAILESH

Chief Operating Officer

$606,796

@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02

SCHULTEN ANDRE

Chief Financial Officer

$647,289

@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02

WHALEY SUSAN STREET

Officer

$156,835

@ $156.84 · 2025-08-29

COOMBE GARY A

Officer

$1.61M

@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21

RAMAN SUNDAR G.

Officer

$1.51M

@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21

MOELLER JON R

Chief Executive Officer

$6.31M

@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19

PRITCHARD MARC S

Officer

$1.55M

@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19

JANZARUK MATTHEW W.

Officer

$50,170

@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19

DAVIS JENNIFER L

Officer

$1.35M

@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19

PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI

Officer

$95,308

@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19

WHALEY SUSAN STREET

Officer

$969,908

@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19

JEJURIKAR SHAILESH

Chief Operating Officer

$2.05M

@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19

FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA

Officer

$1.43M

@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19

SCHULTEN ANDRE

Chief Financial Officer

$1.83M

@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19

AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER

Officer

$1.67M

@ $158.67 · 2025-05-05

DAVIS JENNIFER L

Officer

$161,384

@ $161.38 · 2025-04-29

COOMBE GARY A

Officer

$6.08M

@ $173.68 · 2025-02-28

COOMBE GARY A

Officer

$3.09M

@ $171.66 · 2025-02-25

PRITCHARD MARC S

Officer

$14.82M

@ $163.84 · 2025-01-23

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →

DIS

😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →

DIS

⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)

⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)

View DIS Full Analysis View PG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DIS vs PG

Is Walt Disney Company (The) or Procter & Gamble Company (The) more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DIS trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $254584003147 vs. price $96), compared to PG's 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $220753045647 vs. $144).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Walt Disney Company (The) or Procter & Gamble Company (The)?▼

PG scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while DIS scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Walt Disney Company (The) in financial distress?▼

DIS's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PG scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Walt Disney Company (The) or Procter & Gamble Company (The)?▼

PG earns 15.2% ROIC versus DIS's 7.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.