Compare Stocks › DIS vs MRK

The Walt Disney Company (DIS) vs Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, DIS is fairly valued at $111, with a DCF intrinsic value of $135 and a margin of safety of 18%. MRK is undervalued at $150, with an intrinsic value of $596 and a margin of safety of 75%. Of the two, MRK has the wider margin of safety.

DIS
The Walt Disney Company
$110.94
VS
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
$149.52

Rewards

DIS
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 111.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.06 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 2 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
MRK
  • ★Gross margin of 76.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.94 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

DIS
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.61 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
MRK
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.82 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠7 insider sales totaling $30.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 5.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DIS
MRK
Valuation
$10.08B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
5.26%
FCF Yield
N/A
22.87
Trailing P/E
151.03
14.80
Forward P/E
16.44
Quality & Moat
9.25%
ROIC
22.88%
8.01%
ROE
43.48%
37.59%
Gross Margin
76.91%
3.61
PEG Ratio
2.82
Balance Sheet Safety
0.35
Net Debt / Equity
1.11
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.95
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.93
1.35%
Dividend Yield
2.27%
DIS: 4Ties: 1MRK: 5
DISMRK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DIS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MRK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DIS
$2.96
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$16.56B
Δ Market Cap
+$49.03B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MRK
$-1.72
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$12.28B
Δ Market Cap
$-21.09B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DIS
17.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 17.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $110.94
Fair Value: $134.67
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MRK
74.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 74.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $149.52
Fair Value: $596.15
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DIS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $111?

+6.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.6%

The market implies +6.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MRK

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DIS
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MRK
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DIS
-2.61
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MRK
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DIS
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,852
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MRK
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.9%Retail & Other 17.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,903
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DIS
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.11M
CHANG AMY L
Director
$98,791
@ $107.85 · 2026-02-12
GORMAN JAMES P
Director
$2.01M
@ $111.89 · 2025-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MRK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
THULIN INGE G
Director
$250,000
@ $88.28 · 2025-02-06
BAKER DOUGLAS M JR
Director
$1.33M
@ $88.50 · 2025-02-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DIS
4
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.41M
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$318,958
@ $111.68 · 2026-10-16
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$387,596
@ $107.13 · 2026-09-01
ROEDER PAUL M
Officer
$382,327
@ $106.32 · 2026-08-19
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$762,234
@ $105.31 · 2026-08-14
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$281,922
@ $114.00 · 2026-01-22
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$277,134
@ $114.00 · 2025-12-24
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$233,701
@ $118.57 · 2025-08-25
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$110,845
@ $110.84 · 2025-05-13
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$74,936
@ $108.76 · 2025-01-22
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$342,766
@ $111.36 · 2024-12-17
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$917,920
@ $114.74 · 2024-12-11
IGER ROBERT A
Chief Executive Officer
$42.67M
@ $114.57 · 2024-11-22
WOODFORD BRENT A
Officer
$568,101
@ $113.62 · 2024-11-20
COLEMAN SONIA L
Officer
$279,772
@ $99.99 · 2024-11-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MRK
7
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $72.01M
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.35M
@ $135.00 · 2026-08-13
ZACHARY JENNIFER L
General Counsel
$10.72M
@ $133.46 · 2026-08-12
DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
Officer
$5.94M
@ $131.12 · 2026-08-12
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.97M
@ $131.00 · 2026-08-06
DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
Officer
$788,773
@ $130.38 · 2026-08-06
MARALDO DAVID R.
Officer
$2.41M
@ $128.72 · 2026-08-05
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$6.81M
@ $128.77 · 2026-08-05
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.21M
@ $121.46 · 2026-02-12
LI DEAN Y
Officer
$1.20M
@ $117.52 · 2026-02-10
ZACHARY JENNIFER L
General Counsel
$14.49M
@ $119.15 · 2026-02-09
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$1.18M
@ $118.41 · 2026-02-09
OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
Officer
$1.83M
@ $121.87 · 2026-02-06
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$609,525
@ $121.91 · 2026-02-06
DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
Officer
$4.56M
@ $120.92 · 2026-02-06
GUINDO CHIRFI
Officer
$2.44M
@ $121.88 · 2026-02-05
SMART DALTON E. III
Officer
$765,920
@ $119.67 · 2026-02-04
LITCHFIELD CAROLINE
Chief Financial Officer
$5.02M
@ $119.61 · 2026-02-04
LI DEAN Y
Officer
$1.79M
@ $118.77 · 2026-02-04
DAVIS ROBERT M
Chief Executive Officer
$5.60M
@ $118.04 · 2026-02-04
DOWNING CRISTAL N.
Officer
$616,395
@ $87.00 · 2025-11-10
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$720,040
@ $83.59 · 2025-11-03
SMART DALTON E. III
Officer
$352,723
@ $82.76 · 2025-04-25
OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
Officer
$714,745
@ $84.09 · 2025-02-19
WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
Chief Technology Officer
$512,057
@ $85.34 · 2025-02-13
DOWNING CRISTAL N.
Officer
$209,551
@ $88.76 · 2025-02-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DIS
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MRK
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DIS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
MRK
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View DIS Full AnalysisView MRK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DIS vs MRK

Is The Walt Disney Company or Merck & Co., Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MRK trades at a 74.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $596 vs. price $150), compared to DIS's 17.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $135 vs. $111).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Walt Disney Company or Merck & Co., Inc.?▼

MRK scores 68/100 (Narrow moat), while DIS scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Walt Disney Company in financial distress?▼

DIS's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MRK scores 3.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Walt Disney Company or Merck & Co., Inc.?▼

MRK earns 22.9% ROIC versus DIS's 9.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, The Walt Disney Company's or Merck & Co., Inc.'s?▼

DIS's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to MRK's 79/100 (Safe). DIS has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.