Compare StocksDIS vs INTC

The Walt Disney Company (DIS) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

DIS
The Walt Disney Company
$99.20
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

DIS
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 111.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.96 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 2 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
INTC

    Risks

    DIS
    • FCF yield of 5.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    DIS
    INTC
    Valuation
    $10.08B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    5.73%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    13.48
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    7.23%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    10.88%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    37.28%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.41
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.12
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    1.51%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    DIS: 5Ties: 2INTC: 2
    DISINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    DIS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    DIS
    $2.96
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $16.56B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$49.03B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    DIS
    36.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 36.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $99.20
    Fair Value: $155.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    DIS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $99?

    +5.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.7%

    The market implies +5.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    DIS
    51/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    DIS
    -2.61
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    DIS
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 77.3%Retail & Other 22.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,060
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    DIS
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.11M
    CHANG AMY L
    Director
    $98,791
    @ $107.85 · 2026-02-12
    GORMAN JAMES P
    Director
    $2.01M
    @ $111.89 · 2025-12-12
    MCDONALD CALVIN
    Director
    $999,994
    @ $85.06 · 2024-08-08
    GORMAN JAMES P
    Director
    $2.12M
    @ $106.03 · 2024-05-08
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    DIS
    2
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $903,602
    COLEMAN SONIA L
    Officer
    $281,922
    @ $114.00 · 2026-01-22
    COLEMAN SONIA L
    Officer
    $277,134
    @ $114.00 · 2025-12-24
    COLEMAN SONIA L
    Officer
    $233,701
    @ $118.57 · 2025-08-25
    WOODFORD BRENT A
    Officer
    $110,845
    @ $110.84 · 2025-05-13
    COLEMAN SONIA L
    Officer
    $74,936
    @ $108.76 · 2025-01-22
    COLEMAN SONIA L
    Officer
    $342,766
    @ $111.36 · 2024-12-17
    WOODFORD BRENT A
    Officer
    $917,920
    @ $114.74 · 2024-12-11
    IGER ROBERT A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $42.67M
    @ $114.57 · 2024-11-22
    WOODFORD BRENT A
    Officer
    $568,101
    @ $113.62 · 2024-11-20
    COLEMAN SONIA L
    Officer
    $279,772
    @ $99.99 · 2024-11-11
    COLEMAN SONIA L
    Officer
    $466,400
    @ $106.00 · 2024-05-09
    COLEMAN SONIA L
    Officer
    $226,405
    @ $121.92 · 2024-04-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    DIS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(42/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    DIS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View DIS Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis