Compare StocksDHR vs PFE

Danaher Corporation (DHR) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

DHR
Danaher Corporation
$175.15
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$26.33

Rewards

DHR
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.49 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Dividend yield of 6.53% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • FCF yield of 9.0% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

DHR
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 2 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • PEG ratio of 3.46 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 9 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 13.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DHR
PFE
Valuation
$4.57B
Free Cash Flow
$13.43B
3.69%
FCF Yield
8.97%
33.88
Trailing P/E
19.36
19.26
Forward P/E
9.36
Quality & Moat
6.18%
ROIC
7.67%
6.82%
ROE
8.96%
58.99%
Gross Margin
75.81%
3.46
PEG Ratio
13.77
Balance Sheet Safety
0.37
Debt / Equity
0.78
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.76
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.10
0.91%
Dividend Yield
6.53%
DHR: 3Ties: 1PFE: 8
DHRPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DHR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DHR
$-1.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$9.38B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.55B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DHR
94.1% Overvalued
Price is 94.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $175.15
Fair Value: $90.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
130.7% Overvalued
Price is 130.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $26.33
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DHR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $175?

+16.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.3%

The market implies +16.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $26?

+11.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.0%

The market implies +11.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DHR
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DHR
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DHR
Insiders 10.8%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 4.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,965
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.9%Retail & Other 32.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,687
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DHR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DHR
1
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $482.06M
MILOSEVICH GREGORY M
Officer
$274,575
@ $208.01 · 2026-02-19
LIST TERI
Director
$746,997
@ $226.50 · 2025-11-18
RALES MITCHELL P
Officer and Director
$95.57M
@ $218.69 · 2025-11-12
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$4.77M
@ $219.23 · 2025-11-12
MCGREW MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$3.47M
@ $214.62 · 2025-11-11
COUCHARA GEORGEANN F.
Officer
$1.09M
@ $210.42 · 2025-11-10
RALES MITCHELL P
Officer and Director
$129.64M
@ $216.06 · 2025-10-31
LIST-STOLL TERI L.
Director
$586,319
@ $211.06 · 2025-08-22
RALES STEVEN M
Chairman of the Board
$245.92M
@ $196.74 · 2025-05-12
RILEY CHRISTOPHER PAUL
Officer
$3.13M
@ $198.00 · 2025-04-30
SPOON ALAN G
Director
$113,553
@ $206.46 · 2025-02-07
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $224.13 · 2025-01-30
RASKAS DANIEL A
Officer
$8.22M
@ $236.93 · 2024-11-26
COUCHARA GEORGEANN F.
Officer
$255,483
@ $268.36 · 2024-08-26
MCGREW MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$4.53M
@ $279.84 · 2024-08-01
FILLER LINDA
Director
$1.10M
@ $279.50 · 2024-08-01
BLAIR RAINER M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.52M
@ $280.00 · 2024-07-31
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$2.64M
@ $275.16 · 2024-07-25
RASKAS DANIEL A
Officer
$3.92M
@ $270.51 · 2024-07-25
BLAIR RAINER M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $265.00 · 2024-05-16
BLAIR RAINER M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.87M
@ $255.00 · 2024-05-14
MCGREW MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$11.74M
@ $253.05 · 2024-05-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DHR
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DHR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View DHR Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis
DHR vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io