Compare Stocks › DHR vs MA

Danaher Corporation (DHR) vs Mastercard Incorporated (MA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, DHR is overvalued at $232, with a DCF intrinsic value of $125 and a margin of safety of -86%. MA is overvalued at $638, with an intrinsic value of $563 and a margin of safety of -13%. Of the two, MA has the wider margin of safety.

DHR
Danaher Corporation
$232.23
VS
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$638.01

Rewards

DHR
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 4.49 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
MA
  • ★Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

DHR
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 2 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠8 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
MA
  • ⚠FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠High leverage (2.00x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠9 insider sales totaling $24.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DHR
MA
Valuation
$4.75B
Free Cash Flow
$16.63B
2.91%
FCF Yield
2.99%
38.45
Trailing P/E
33.39
24.92
Forward P/E
27.58
Quality & Moat
5.25%
ROIC
56.56%
8.19%
ROE
231.37%
59.36%
Gross Margin
100.00%
1.32
PEG Ratio
1.66
Balance Sheet Safety
0.41
Net Debt / Equity
2.00
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.68
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.59
0.69%
Dividend Yield
0.55%
DHR: 4Ties: 2MA: 6
DHRMA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DHR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DHR
$-1.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$9.38B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.55B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MA
$5.62
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$31.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$177.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DHR
85.7% Overvalued
Price is 85.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $232.23
Fair Value: $125.07
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MA
13.3% Overvalued
Price is 13.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $638.01
Fair Value: $562.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DHR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $232?

+16.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.8%

The market implies +16.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $638?

+16.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%

The market implies +16.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +15.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DHR
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MA
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DHR
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MA
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DHR
Insiders 10.8%Institutions 83.6%Retail & Other 5.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,909
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MA
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.1%Retail & Other 8.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,838
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DHR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DHR
1
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $107.94M
BOUDA CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.78M
@ $234.56 · 2026-10-28
SPOON ALAN G
Director
$237,207
@ $174.67 · 2026-05-01
MILOSEVICH GREGORY M
Officer
$274,575
@ $208.01 · 2026-02-19
LIST-STOLL TERI L.
Director
$746,997
@ $226.50 · 2025-11-18
RALES MITCHELL P
Officer and Director
$95.57M
@ $218.69 · 2025-11-12
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$4.77M
@ $219.23 · 2025-11-12
MCGREW MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$3.47M
@ $214.62 · 2025-11-11
COUCHARA GEORGEANN F.
Officer
$1.09M
@ $210.42 · 2025-11-10
RALES MITCHELL P
Officer and Director
$129.64M
@ $216.06 · 2025-10-31
LIST-STOLL TERI L.
Director
$586,319
@ $211.06 · 2025-08-22
RALES STEVEN M
Chairman of the Board
$245.92M
@ $196.74 · 2025-05-12
RILEY CHRISTOPHER PAUL
Officer
$3.13M
@ $198.00 · 2025-04-30
SPOON ALAN G
Director
$113,553
@ $206.46 · 2025-02-07
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $224.13 · 2025-01-30
RASKAS DANIEL A
Officer
$8.22M
@ $236.93 · 2024-11-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MA
9
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $69.73M
LING HAI
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $620.00 · 2026-10-16
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$435,418
@ $587.61 · 2026-10-12
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.91M
@ $584.00 · 2026-09-02
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$547,837
@ $593.54 · 2026-08-31
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$4.87M
@ $576.53 · 2026-08-20
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$673,201
@ $565.24 · 2026-08-17
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.84M
@ $575.00 · 2026-08-05
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.72M
@ $571.87 · 2026-08-05
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$2.44M
@ $570.31 · 2026-08-04
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$19.08M
@ $573.84 · 2026-08-03
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$185,760
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-15
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$10.59M
@ $534.87 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$216,000
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-07
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$3.58M
@ $526.37 · 2026-07-02
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$7.49M
@ $525.19 · 2026-07-01
LING HAI
Officer
$4.48M
@ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.20M
@ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
LING HAI
Officer
$2.69M
@ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.46M
@ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.83M
@ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$178,049
@ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$601,447
@ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$173,910
@ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.02M
@ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$508,474
@ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$1.76M
@ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$549,373
@ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.55M
@ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$8.22M
@ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$218,223
@ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$257,535
@ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.68M
@ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$3.81M
@ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.12M
@ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.78M
@ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.19M
@ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$7.97M
@ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.17M
@ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$6.18M
@ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DHR
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MA
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DHR
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
MA
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View DHR Full AnalysisView MA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DHR vs MA

Is Danaher Corporation or Mastercard Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MA trades at a -13.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $563 vs. price $638), compared to DHR's -85.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $125 vs. $232).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Danaher Corporation or Mastercard Incorporated?▼

MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while DHR scores 46/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Danaher Corporation or Mastercard Incorporated?▼

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) generates a 3.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Danaher Corporation's 2.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Danaher Corporation or Mastercard Incorporated?▼

MA earns 56.6% ROIC versus DHR's 5.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Danaher Corporation's or Mastercard Incorporated's?▼

MA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to DHR's 88/100 (Very Safe). MA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.