Compare Stocks › DHR vs JPM
Danaher Corporation (DHR) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)
DHR
Danaher Corporation
$190.11
VS
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$287.97
Rewards
DHR
- ★Altman Z-Score of 4.49 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
JPM
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
Risks
DHR
- ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 2 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
- ⚠PEG ratio of 3.02 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
- ⚠10 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
JPM
- ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
- ⚠JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores only 18/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
- ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →DHR
JPM
Valuation
$4.55B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
3.39%
FCF Yield
N/A
37.72
Trailing P/E
14.39
20.86
Forward P/E
12.26
Quality & Moat
5.96%
ROIC
5.32%
6.88%
ROE
N/A
59.23%
Gross Margin
0.00%
3.02
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.37
Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.92
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.84%
Dividend Yield
2.08%
DHR: 2Ties: 1JPM: 3
DHRJPM
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →DHR
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
JPM
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →DHR
$-1.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$9.38B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.55B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JPM
$3.95
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$120.20B
Δ Market Cap
+$475.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →DHR
105.3% Overvalued
Price is 105.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $190.11
Strongly undervalued
Fairly valued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $92.60
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JPM
46.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 46.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $287.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $538.22
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →DHR
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $190?
+17.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.4%
The market implies +17.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
JPM
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →DHR
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
JPM
18/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →DHR
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JPM
-2.17
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →DHR
Insiders 11.1%Institutions 84.6%Retail & Other 4.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,056
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JPM
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.0%Retail & Other 24.6%
No. of Institutional Holders6,239
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →DHR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JPM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →DHR
1
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $485.19M
MILOSEVICH GREGORY M
Officer
$274,575
@ $208.01 · 2026-02-19
LIST TERI
Director
$746,997
@ $226.50 · 2025-11-18
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$4.77M
@ $219.23 · 2025-11-12
RALES MITCHELL P
Officer and Director
$95.57M
@ $218.69 · 2025-11-12
MCGREW MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$3.47M
@ $214.62 · 2025-11-11
COUCHARA GEORGEANN F.
Officer
$1.09M
@ $210.42 · 2025-11-10
RALES MITCHELL P
Officer and Director
$129.64M
@ $216.06 · 2025-10-31
LIST-STOLL TERI L.
Director
$586,319
@ $211.06 · 2025-08-22
RALES STEVEN M
Chairman of the Board
$245.92M
@ $196.74 · 2025-05-12
RILEY CHRISTOPHER PAUL
Officer
$3.13M
@ $198.00 · 2025-04-30
SPOON ALAN G
Director
$113,553
@ $206.46 · 2025-02-07
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $224.13 · 2025-01-30
RASKAS DANIEL A
Officer
$8.22M
@ $236.93 · 2024-11-26
COUCHARA GEORGEANN F.
Officer
$255,483
@ $268.36 · 2024-08-26
MCGREW MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$4.53M
@ $279.84 · 2024-08-01
FILLER LINDA
Director
$1.10M
@ $279.50 · 2024-08-01
BLAIR RAINER M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.52M
@ $280.00 · 2024-07-31
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$2.64M
@ $275.16 · 2024-07-25
RASKAS DANIEL A
Officer
$3.92M
@ $270.51 · 2024-07-25
BLAIR RAINER M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $265.00 · 2024-05-16
BLAIR RAINER M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.87M
@ $255.00 · 2024-05-14
MCGREW MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$11.74M
@ $253.05 · 2024-05-10
SPOON ALAN G
Director
$172,455
@ $243.58 · 2024-05-02
WEIDEMANIS JOAKIM
Officer
$5.62M
@ $250.46 · 2024-04-25
ELLIS BRIAN W
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $250.01 · 2024-04-24
BLAIR RAINER M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.76M
@ $249.22 · 2024-04-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JPM
12
Sells (3M)
30
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $104.76M
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$132,684
@ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$15.36M
@ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$886,157
@ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$627,207
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.07M
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.68M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$904,890
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$640,295
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.79M
@ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.09M
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.30M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$301,311
@ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.83M
@ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.39M
@ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.61M
@ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$1.57M
@ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
LAKE MARIANNE
Officer
$3.28M
@ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$2.71M
@ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.69M
@ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$3.29M
@ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.54M
@ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$10.03M
@ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.38M
@ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$31.50M
@ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$308,652
@ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.06M
@ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$6.18M
@ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$506,698
@ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$337,610
@ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.15M
@ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$10.12M
@ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$554,054
@ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$919,371
@ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.47M
@ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$971,646
@ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$838,778
@ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.34M
@ $253.97 · 2025-01-16
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.81M
@ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$886,565
@ $253.96 · 2025-01-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →DHR
😐Neutral(41/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JPM
😐Neutral(51/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →DHR
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
JPM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)