SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › DG vs INTC

Dollar General Corporation (DG) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

DG
Dollar General Corporation
$123.45
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

DG
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.15 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
INTC

    Risks

    DG
    • ⚠ROIC has declined by 7.0 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • ⚠FCF yield of 7.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    INTC
    • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    DG
    INTC
    Valuation
    $2.13B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    7.83%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    18.02
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    15.43
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    7.74%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    17.77%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    30.66%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    0.15
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.85
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.49
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    1.91%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    DG: 5Ties: 1INTC: 3
    DGINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    DG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    DG
    $-7.47
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $3.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-27.44B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    DG
    112.6% Overvalued
    Price is 112.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $123.45
    Fair Value: $58.07
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    DG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $123?

    +16.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +7.5%

    The market implies +16.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    DG
    55/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    DG
    -2.72
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    DG
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 100.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,578
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    DG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    BRYANT WARREN F
    Director
    $80,825
    @ $80.83 · 2024-09-10
    BRYANT WARREN F
    Director
    $40,200
    @ $80.40 · 2024-09-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    DG
    0
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $9.29M
    WHEELER BRYAN D
    Officer
    $1.32M
    @ $135.32 · 2025-12-19
    TAYLOR RHONDA M
    General Counsel
    $1.01M
    @ $134.89 · 2025-12-16
    WEST RODERICK J
    Officer
    $304,316
    @ $133.35 · 2025-12-16
    ELLIOTT ANITA C
    Officer
    $333,424
    @ $132.52 · 2025-12-12
    WENKOFF CARMAN R
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $132.01 · 2025-12-11
    HERRMANN TRACEY N
    Officer
    $2.21M
    @ $126.82 · 2025-12-11
    REARDON KATHLEEN A
    Officer
    $558,028
    @ $126.97 · 2025-12-08
    TAYLOR EMILY C
    Officer
    $222,501
    @ $113.00 · 2025-06-17
    REARDON KATHLEEN A
    Officer
    $718,229
    @ $111.56 · 2025-06-12
    TAYLOR EMILY C
    Officer
    $76,627
    @ $94.72 · 2025-04-04
    TAYLOR EMILY C
    Officer
    $367,061
    @ $77.44 · 2024-12-13
    REARDON KATHLEEN A
    Officer
    $296,241
    @ $82.68 · 2024-12-10
    DECKARD STEVEN R
    Officer
    $174,195
    @ $86.66 · 2024-09-18
    WEST RODERICK J
    Officer
    $208,960
    @ $83.25 · 2024-09-12
    SANTANA RALPH E
    Director
    $468,567
    @ $155.72 · 2024-04-11
    WENKOFF CARMAN R
    Chief Technology Officer
    $958,616
    @ $162.23 · 2024-04-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    DG
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(40/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    DG
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
    INTC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View DG Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis