Compare StocksDECK vs GOOGL

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, DECK is undervalued at $109, with a DCF intrinsic value of $202 and a margin of safety of 46%. GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with an intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. Of the two, DECK has the wider margin of safety.

DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
$109.11
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03

Rewards

DECK
  • Deckers Outdoor Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Deckers Outdoor Corporation scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 34.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

DECK
  • FCF yield of 5.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DECK
GOOGL
Valuation
$858.73M
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
5.67%
FCF Yield
1.63%
15.54
Trailing P/E
28.09
13.15
Forward P/E
25.39
Quality & Moat
21.06%
ROIC
20.98%
40.86%
ROE
38.88%
57.70%
Gross Margin
60.37%
1.37
PEG Ratio
1.47
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.14
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.19
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.24%
DECK: 6Ties: 4GOOGL: 2
DECKGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DECK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DECK
$-0.81
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.75B
Δ Market Cap
$-2.22B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DECK
46.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 46.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $109.11
Fair Value: $202.36
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DECK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $109?

+2.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +2.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DECK
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DECK
-2.77
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DECK
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 100.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,319
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DECK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
DAVIS CINDY L
Director
$200,319
@ $109.76 · 2025-06-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DECK
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.20M
SPANGENBERG ANNE
Officer
$471,389
@ $116.02 · 2026-02-13
SPRING-GREEN ROBIN
Officer
$39,482
@ $113.78 · 2026-02-13
SHANAHAN LAURI M.
Director
$537,681
@ $114.84 · 2026-02-13
OGBECHIE ANGELA
Officer
$118,910
@ $81.45 · 2025-10-31
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$35,405
@ $118.02 · 2025-09-08
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$32,723
@ $109.08 · 2025-06-06
OGBECHIE ANGELA
Officer
$648,675
@ $103.89 · 2025-06-02
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$40,344
@ $134.48 · 2025-03-06
POWERS DAVID A
Director
$3.47M
@ $138.84 · 2025-02-28
STEFANO CAROTI
Chief Executive Officer
$2.97M
@ $208.34 · 2024-12-11
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$60,239
@ $200.80 · 2024-12-06
SPANGENBERG ANNE
Officer
$723,721
@ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
STEWART BONITA C
Director
$838,935
@ $186.43 · 2024-11-22
ELLERKER MARCO
Officer
$992,858
@ $175.20 · 2024-11-20
STEFANO CAROTI
Chief Executive Officer
$2.64M
@ $175.73 · 2024-11-19
GARCIA THOMAS
Officer
$3.16M
@ $175.28 · 2024-11-19
FASCHING STEVEN J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.54M
@ $175.00 · 2024-11-08
STEWART BONITA C
Director
$1.58M
@ $175.42 · 2024-11-08
OGBECHIE ANGELA
Officer
$208,617
@ $163.24 · 2024-10-31
FASCHING STEVEN J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.53M
@ $166.67 · 2024-10-04
IBRAHIM MAHA SALEH
Director
$43,253
@ $865.06 · 2024-09-06
POWERS DAVID A
Director
$3.38M
@ $863.08 · 2024-09-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DECK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DECK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
View DECK Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DECK vs GOOGL

Is Deckers Outdoor Corporation or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DECK trades at a 46.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $202 vs. price $109), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Deckers Outdoor Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?

DECK scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DECK scores 11.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Deckers Outdoor Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) generates a 5.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Deckers Outdoor Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?

DECK earns 21.1% ROIC versus GOOGL's 21.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.