Compare Stocks › DDOG vs JPM

Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, DDOG is overvalued at $235, with a DCF intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -968%. JPM is undervalued at $337, with an intrinsic value of $633 and a margin of safety of 47%. Of the two, JPM has the wider margin of safety.

DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
$235.27
VS
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$337.04

Rewards

DDOG
  • ★Gross margin of 79.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 37.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.16 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
JPM
  • ★JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.79 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

DDOG
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 10% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠23 insider sales totaling $162.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
JPM
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠31 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DDOG
JPM
Valuation
$1.05B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.24%
FCF Yield
N/A
470.54
Trailing P/E
14.14
78.83
Forward P/E
13.20
Quality & Moat
0.37%
ROIC
4.84%
4.70%
ROE
18.01%
79.54%
Gross Margin
0.00%
1.22
PEG Ratio
1.43
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-44.73
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.96%
DDOG: 2Ties: 1JPM: 5
DDOGJPM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DDOG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

JPM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DDOG
$71.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$340.1M
Δ Market Cap
+$24.48B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JPM
$3.95
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$120.20B
Δ Market Cap
+$475.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DDOG
967.6% Overvalued
Price is 967.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $235.27
Fair Value: $22.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JPM
46.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 46.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $337.04
Fair Value: $632.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DDOG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $235?

+60.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +26.2%

The market implies +60.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +26.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

JPM

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DDOG
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
JPM
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DDOG
-2.63
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JPM
-2.17
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DDOG
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 93.3%Retail & Other 6.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,842
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JPM
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.6%Retail & Other 24.0%
No. of Institutional Holders6,391
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DDOG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JPM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DDOG
23
Sells (3M)
58
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $466.49M
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$1.21M
@ $228.85 · 2026-09-14
OBSTLER DAVID M
Chief Financial Officer
$9.10M
@ $227.47 · 2026-09-14
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$2.59M
@ $221.04 · 2026-09-11
LI YANBING
Officer
$2.81M
@ $221.26 · 2026-09-11
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$18.60M
@ $207.86 · 2026-09-08
RICHARDSON JULIE G
Director
$1.19M
@ $212.25 · 2026-09-04
BLITZER ADAM
Chief Operating Officer
$2.58M
@ $214.38 · 2026-09-03
RICHARDSON JULIE G
Director
$1.24M
@ $220.00 · 2026-09-03
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$1.56M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$2.89M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$5.61M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
BLITZER ADAM
Chief Operating Officer
$2.94M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$4.64M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
LI YANBING
Officer
$2.39M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
GALLOREESE DAVID
Officer
$1.02M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
OBSTLER DAVID M
Chief Financial Officer
$3.52M
@ $212.90 · 2026-09-02
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$12.24M
@ $227.02 · 2026-09-01
GALLOREESE DAVID
Officer
$230,714
@ $232.81 · 2026-09-01
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$9.88M
@ $228.63 · 2026-08-24
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$11.08M
@ $235.49 · 2026-08-19
JACOBSON MATTHEW
Director
$15.00M
@ $252.42 · 2026-08-14
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$13.66M
@ $253.36 · 2026-08-10
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$36.45M
@ $286.71 · 2026-08-05
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$11.52M
@ $244.79 · 2026-07-23
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$11.46M
@ $265.23 · 2026-07-20
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$32.93M
@ $259.00 · 2026-07-13
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$13.87M
@ $257.24 · 2026-07-08
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$9.55M
@ $220.97 · 2026-06-22
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$19.68M
@ $232.30 · 2026-06-16
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$1.26M
@ $233.91 · 2026-06-15
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$2.74M
@ $231.02 · 2026-06-11
GALLOREESE DAVID
Officer
$918,590
@ $228.90 · 2026-06-09
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$29.46M
@ $231.69 · 2026-06-08
OBSTLER DAVID M
Chief Financial Officer
$17.38M
@ $231.69 · 2026-06-08
COLE TITILOPE
Director
$1.27M
@ $247.87 · 2026-06-04
BLITZER ADAM
Chief Operating Officer
$6.69M
@ $258.72 · 2026-06-03
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$3.58M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$1.94M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$6.95M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$20.36M
@ $269.94 · 2026-06-02
LI YANBING
Officer
$2.96M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
GALLOREESE DAVID
Officer
$1.26M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
OBSTLER DAVID M
Chief Financial Officer
$4.36M
@ $267.15 · 2026-06-02
JACOBSON MATTHEW
Director
$10.00M
@ $259.10 · 2026-06-01
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$18.94M
@ $223.58 · 2026-05-26
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$8.99M
@ $208.04 · 2026-05-18
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$25.41M
@ $199.84 · 2026-05-11
JACOBSON MATTHEW
Director
$10.00M
@ $189.28 · 2026-05-08
RICHARDSON JULIE G
Director
$817,253
@ $187.31 · 2026-05-08
LI YANBING
Officer
$3.91M
@ $197.35 · 2026-05-08
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$1.44M
@ $188.50 · 2026-05-07
ACOCELLA KERRY
General Counsel
$2.08M
@ $150.00 · 2026-05-05
WALTERS SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$287,100
@ $150.00 · 2026-05-05
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$7.87M
@ $145.95 · 2026-05-05
RICHARDSON JULIE G
Director
$75,300
@ $150.00 · 2026-05-05
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$5.66M
@ $130.84 · 2026-04-22
POMEL OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$4.72M
@ $111.14 · 2026-04-09
LE-QUOC ALEXIS T
Chief Technology Officer
$3.76M
@ $116.46 · 2026-04-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JPM
2
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $96.58M
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$882,026
@ $352.81 · 2026-09-10
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$903,518
@ $361.41 · 2026-08-11
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$1.81M
@ $330.73 · 2026-06-22
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$1.64M
@ $300.27 · 2026-05-20
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.70M
@ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.98M
@ $298.36 · 2026-05-15
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$949,658
@ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$935,032
@ $309.41 · 2026-05-05
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.26M
@ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.52M
@ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$1.72M
@ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.74M
@ $306.58 · 2026-04-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.78M
@ $306.57 · 2026-04-15
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.32M
@ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.80M
@ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$40.00M
@ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$970,660
@ $306.59 · 2026-04-15
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$127,761
@ $295.06 · 2026-03-23
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$15.36M
@ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$132,684
@ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$886,157
@ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.07M
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$627,207
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.79M
@ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.09M
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.30M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.68M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$904,890
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$640,295
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$301,311
@ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.83M
@ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.39M
@ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.61M
@ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
LAKE MARIANNE
Officer
$3.28M
@ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$1.57M
@ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$2.71M
@ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.69M
@ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$3.29M
@ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.54M
@ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$10.03M
@ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.38M
@ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$31.50M
@ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$6.18M
@ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$308,652
@ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.06M
@ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$506,698
@ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$10.12M
@ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$337,610
@ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.15M
@ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$554,054
@ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.47M
@ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$971,646
@ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$919,371
@ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DDOG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JPM
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DDOG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
JPM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View DDOG Full AnalysisView JPM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DDOG vs JPM

Is Datadog, Inc. or JPMorgan Chase & Co. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, JPM trades at a 46.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $633 vs. price $337), compared to DDOG's -967.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $235).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Datadog, Inc. or JPMorgan Chase & Co.?▼

JPM scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while DDOG scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is JPMorgan Chase & Co. in financial distress?▼

JPM's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DDOG scores 11.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Datadog, Inc. or JPMorgan Chase & Co.?▼

JPM earns 4.8% ROIC versus DDOG's 0.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

DDOG vs JPM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io