Compare StocksDASH vs UNH

DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, DASH is fairly valued at $197, with a DCF intrinsic value of $194 and a margin of safety of -2%. UNH is fairly valued at $375, with an intrinsic value of $389 and a margin of safety of 4%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

DASH
DoorDash, Inc.
$196.76
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$375.26

Rewards

DASH
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 343.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $53.76 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Altman Z-Score of 6.80 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

DASH
  • Share count has increased by 11% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DASH
UNH
Valuation
$5.15B
Free Cash Flow
$24.27B
6.04%
FCF Yield
7.21%
103.02
Trailing P/E
24.10
24.16
Forward P/E
16.64
Quality & Moat
3.66%
ROIC
14.16%
8.89%
ROE
14.15%
52.23%
Gross Margin
19.72%
1.17
PEG Ratio
1.04
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.40
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.42
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.57
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.47%
DASH: 3Ties: 1UNH: 8
DASHUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DASH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DASH
$158.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$500.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$79.24B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DASH
1.7% Overvalued
Price is 1.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $196.76
Fair Value: $193.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
3.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 3.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $375.26
Fair Value: $389.12
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DASH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $197?

+26.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.8%
UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $375?

+13.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.3%

The market implies +13.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DASH
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DASH
-3.24
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DASH
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 95.8%Retail & Other 3.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,491
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.7%Retail & Other 10.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,387
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DASH
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $100.28M
KOVAC MILAN
Director
$6,237
@ $155.93 · 2026-03-27
LIN ALFRED
Director
$100.28M
@ $195.07 · 2025-11-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DASH
16
Sells (3M)
77
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $187.33M
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$91,480
@ $221.50 · 2026-09-04
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$3.67M
@ $228.55 · 2026-09-01
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$3.83M
@ $230.00 · 2026-09-01
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$7.67M
@ $230.00 · 2026-08-25
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$12.81M
@ $231.76 · 2026-08-25
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$515,607
@ $227.64 · 2026-08-24
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$489,354
@ $222.03 · 2026-08-24
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$4.30M
@ $220.62 · 2026-08-20
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$1.70M
@ $220.62 · 2026-08-20
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$642,236
@ $220.62 · 2026-08-20
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$1.76M
@ $220.62 · 2026-08-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$3.78M
@ $220.62 · 2026-08-20
FANG ANDY
Director
$351,013
@ $220.62 · 2026-08-20
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$217,302
@ $213.67 · 2026-08-13
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$3.59M
@ $188.04 · 2026-07-08
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$103,049
@ $177.06 · 2026-06-26
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$410,576
@ $155.34 · 2026-05-26
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$3.38M
@ $155.25 · 2026-05-26
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$441,047
@ $160.79 · 2026-05-22
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$354,381
@ $160.79 · 2026-05-22
TANG WEIRUI STANLEY
Director
$247,696
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$3.03M
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$1.20M
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$452,761
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$657,670
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$2.66M
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
FANG ANDY
Director
$181,104
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$1.88M
@ $188.34 · 2026-04-20
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$218,750
@ $175.00 · 2026-04-15
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$1.59M
@ $158.97 · 2026-03-23
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$220,762
@ $176.61 · 2026-03-09
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$2.90M
@ $175.16 · 2026-03-02
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$382,861
@ $176.19 · 2026-02-26
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$693,505
@ $172.60 · 2026-02-25
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$829,652
@ $165.50 · 2026-02-24
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$4.10M
@ $165.56 · 2026-02-24
TANG WEIRUI STANLEY
Director
$159,175
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$2.71M
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$1.46M
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$472,611
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$864,844
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
Chief Executive Officer
$2.75M
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
FANG ANDY
Director
$159,350
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$177,975
@ $175.00 · 2026-02-18
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$226,600
@ $181.28 · 2026-02-09
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$13,067
@ $207.41 · 2026-02-03
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$3.07M
@ $204.59 · 2026-01-20
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$218,797
@ $215.14 · 2026-01-14
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$277,912
@ $222.33 · 2026-01-09
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$3.83M
@ $230.00 · 2026-01-05
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$14,477
@ $229.79 · 2026-01-02
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$7.04M
@ $234.57 · 2025-12-22
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$330,557
@ $231.97 · 2025-12-19
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$3.83M
@ $230.00 · 2025-12-18
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$3.83M
@ $230.00 · 2025-12-09
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$281,238
@ $224.99 · 2025-12-09
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$12,746
@ $205.58 · 2025-12-02
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$441,472
@ $204.48 · 2025-12-01
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$200,000
@ $200.00 · 2025-11-26
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$2.70M
@ $192.47 · 2025-11-25
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$765,706
@ $192.78 · 2025-11-25
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$831,069
@ $187.35 · 2025-11-24
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$4.59M
@ $187.36 · 2025-11-24
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$56.54M
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$3.19M
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$1.83M
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$530,291
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
TANG WEIRUI STANLEY
Director
$245,637
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$974,917
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$3.13M
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
FANG ANDY
Director
$245,441
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$258,162
@ $206.53 · 2025-11-10
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$15,099
@ $239.67 · 2025-11-04
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$376,000
@ $263.86 · 2025-10-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$6.80M
@ $272.32 · 2025-10-14
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$346,840
@ $277.47 · 2025-10-09
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$231,000
@ $280.00 · 2025-10-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $944,910
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$455,910
@ $390.00 · 2026-08-21
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$205,000
@ $410.00 · 2026-08-05
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DASH
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DASH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View DASH Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DASH vs UNH

Is DoorDash, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a 3.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $389 vs. price $375), compared to DASH's -1.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $194 vs. $197).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, DoorDash, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while DASH scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DASH scores 6.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, DoorDash, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to DoorDash, Inc.'s 6.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, DoorDash, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH earns 14.2% ROIC versus DASH's 3.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.