Compare StocksDASH vs GOOGL

DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, DASH is fairly valued at $173, with a DCF intrinsic value of $193 and a margin of safety of 10%. GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with an intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. Of the two, DASH has the wider margin of safety.

DASH
DoorDash, Inc.
$173.46
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03

Rewards

DASH
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 343.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $53.76 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Altman Z-Score of 6.80 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

DASH
  • Share count has increased by 11% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • PEG ratio of 3.79 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DASH
GOOGL
Valuation
$2.30B
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
3.04%
FCF Yield
1.63%
82.21
Trailing P/E
28.09
22.18
Forward P/E
25.39
Quality & Moat
4.53%
ROIC
20.98%
9.92%
ROE
38.88%
51.76%
Gross Margin
60.37%
3.79
PEG Ratio
1.47
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.66
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.19
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.24%
DASH: 4Ties: 1GOOGL: 7
DASHGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DASH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DASH
$158.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$500.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$79.24B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DASH
10.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 10.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $173.46
Fair Value: $192.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DASH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $173?

+24.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.1%
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DASH
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DASH
-3.24
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DASH
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 97.1%Retail & Other 2.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,455
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DASH
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $100.28M
KOVAC MILAN
Director
$6,237
@ $155.93 · 2026-03-27
LIN ALFRED
Director
$100.28M
@ $195.07 · 2025-11-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DASH
14
Sells (3M)
85
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $301.94M
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$410,576
@ $155.34 · 2026-05-26
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$3.38M
@ $155.25 · 2026-05-26
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$441,047
@ $160.79 · 2026-05-22
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$354,381
@ $160.79 · 2026-05-22
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$3.03M
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$1.20M
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
FANG ANDY
Director
$181,104
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
TANG WEIRUI STANLEY
Director
$247,696
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$657,670
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$452,761
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$2.66M
@ $155.59 · 2026-05-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$1.88M
@ $188.34 · 2026-04-20
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$218,750
@ $175.00 · 2026-04-15
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$1.59M
@ $158.97 · 2026-03-23
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$220,762
@ $176.61 · 2026-03-09
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$2.90M
@ $175.16 · 2026-03-02
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$382,861
@ $176.19 · 2026-02-26
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$693,505
@ $172.60 · 2026-02-25
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$829,652
@ $165.50 · 2026-02-24
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$4.10M
@ $165.56 · 2026-02-24
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$2.71M
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$1.46M
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
FANG ANDY
Director
$159,350
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
TANG WEIRUI STANLEY
Director
$159,175
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$864,844
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$472,611
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
Chief Executive Officer
$2.75M
@ $175.50 · 2026-02-20
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$177,975
@ $175.00 · 2026-02-18
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$226,600
@ $181.28 · 2026-02-09
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$13,067
@ $207.41 · 2026-02-03
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$3.07M
@ $204.59 · 2026-01-20
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$218,797
@ $215.14 · 2026-01-14
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$277,912
@ $222.33 · 2026-01-09
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$3.83M
@ $230.00 · 2026-01-05
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$14,477
@ $229.79 · 2026-01-02
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$7.04M
@ $234.57 · 2025-12-22
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$330,557
@ $231.97 · 2025-12-19
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$3.83M
@ $230.00 · 2025-12-18
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$3.83M
@ $230.00 · 2025-12-09
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$281,238
@ $224.99 · 2025-12-09
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$12,746
@ $205.58 · 2025-12-02
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$441,472
@ $204.48 · 2025-12-01
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$200,000
@ $200.00 · 2025-11-26
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$2.70M
@ $192.47 · 2025-11-25
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$765,706
@ $192.78 · 2025-11-25
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$831,069
@ $187.35 · 2025-11-24
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$4.59M
@ $187.36 · 2025-11-24
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$3.19M
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$1.83M
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$56.54M
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
FANG ANDY
Director
$245,441
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$3.13M
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
TANG WEIRUI STANLEY
Director
$245,637
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$974,917
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$530,291
@ $196.04 · 2025-11-20
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$258,162
@ $206.53 · 2025-11-10
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$15,099
@ $239.67 · 2025-11-04
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$376,000
@ $263.86 · 2025-10-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$6.80M
@ $272.32 · 2025-10-14
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$346,840
@ $277.47 · 2025-10-09
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$231,000
@ $280.00 · 2025-10-06
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$16,672
@ $268.90 · 2025-10-02
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$9.16M
@ $268.24 · 2025-10-01
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$8.12M
@ $270.60 · 2025-09-29
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$379,278
@ $266.16 · 2025-09-24
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$13.24M
@ $258.26 · 2025-09-15
BROWN SHONA L
Director
$318,286
@ $254.63 · 2025-09-09
STILL ASHLEY
Director
$15,371
@ $243.98 · 2025-09-03
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$731,000
@ $250.00 · 2025-09-03
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$12.59M
@ $245.71 · 2025-09-03
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$4.39M
@ $243.16 · 2025-09-02
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$458,491
@ $248.37 · 2025-08-27
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$3.43M
@ $247.22 · 2025-08-26
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$10.30M
@ $245.82 · 2025-08-25
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$1.30M
@ $245.84 · 2025-08-25
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$1.08M
@ $246.67 · 2025-08-22
INUKONDA RAVI KIRAN REDDY
Chief Financial Officer
$3.91M
@ $238.19 · 2025-08-20
SHERRINGHAM TIA A.
General Counsel
$2.24M
@ $238.19 · 2025-08-20
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$69.41M
@ $238.19 · 2025-08-20
FANG ANDY
Director
$300,828
@ $238.19 · 2025-08-20
ADARKAR PRABIR RAJENDRA
President
$3.84M
@ $238.19 · 2025-08-20
TANG WEIRUI STANLEY
Director
$300,828
@ $238.19 · 2025-08-20
YANDELL KEITH
Officer
$1.20M
@ $238.19 · 2025-08-20
LEE GORDON S
Officer
$650,962
@ $238.19 · 2025-08-20
XU TONY
Chief Executive Officer
$12.75M
@ $248.70 · 2025-08-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DASH
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DASH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
View DASH Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DASH vs GOOGL

Is DoorDash, Inc. or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DASH trades at a 10.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $193 vs. price $173), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, DoorDash, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while DASH scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. DASH scores 6.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, DoorDash, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) generates a 3.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, DoorDash, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus DASH's 4.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.