Compare Stocks › DAL vs INTC

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, DAL is undervalued at $80, with a DCF intrinsic value of $441 and a margin of safety of 82%. INTC is overvalued at $66, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. Of the two, DAL has the wider margin of safety.

DAL
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
$80.15
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76

Rewards

DAL
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.36 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.21 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

DAL
  • ⚠Gross margin of 17.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 16.0x is 54% above the historical average of 10.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
DAL
INTC
Valuation
$3.84B
Free Cash Flow
$670.37M
7.29%
FCF Yield
0.19%
16.00
Trailing P/E
N/A
10.98
Forward P/E
35.50
Quality & Moat
9.65%
ROIC
4.06%
15.91%
ROE
-9.62%
17.90%
Gross Margin
40.15%
0.21
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
0.72
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.20
1.07%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
DAL: 7Ties: 1INTC: 3
DALINTC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
DAL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
DAL
$1.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$12.18B
Δ Market Cap
+$24.26B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
DAL
85.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 85.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $80.15
Fair Value: $553.27
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
DAL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $80?

+2.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.2%

The market implies +2.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
DAL
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
DAL
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
DAL
Insiders 9.2%Institutions 80.5%Retail & Other 10.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,932
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
DAL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
DAL
6
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $125.42M
SEAR STEVEN M
Officer
$3.79M
@ $93.55 · 2026-08-05
HUERTA MICHAEL P
Director
$291,756
@ $94.11 · 2026-08-05
BELLEMARE ALAIN
Officer
$3.25M
@ $92.72 · 2026-08-04
BELLEMARE ALAIN
Officer
$3.25M
@ $92.72 · 2026-08-04
CARTER PETER W
President
$3.71M
@ $92.98 · 2026-08-04
BASTIAN EDWARD H
Chief Executive Officer
$19.16M
@ $92.80 · 2026-08-04
DEWALT DAVID G
Director
$2.88M
@ $90.85 · 2026-08-03
AUSBAND ALLISON C
Officer
$799,500
@ $79.95 · 2026-05-27
BELLEMARE ALAIN
Officer
$2.04M
@ $81.44 · 2026-05-27
AUSBAND ALLISON C
Officer
$1.11M
@ $75.15 · 2026-05-22
BELLEMARE ALAIN
Officer
$1.50M
@ $72.75 · 2026-05-07
LAUGHTER JOHN E.
Chief Operating Officer
$1.07M
@ $71.61 · 2026-04-14
LAUGHTER JOHN E.
Officer
$4.72M
@ $68.15 · 2026-04-10
BASTIAN EDWARD H
Chief Executive Officer
$7.03M
@ $70.26 · 2026-02-26
BELLEMARE ALAIN
Officer
$2.65M
@ $75.20 · 2026-02-09
SEAR STEVEN M
Officer
$2.90M
@ $75.05 · 2026-02-09
HAUENSTEIN GLEN W
President
$31.37M
@ $73.47 · 2026-02-09
CARTER PETER W
Officer
$2.02M
@ $74.82 · 2026-02-06
SAMANT RAHUL D
Chief Technology Officer
$4.39M
@ $70.18 · 2026-02-05
HAUENSTEIN GLEN W
President
$963,896
@ $71.00 · 2026-02-05
CARROLL WILLIAM C
Officer
$406,329
@ $68.10 · 2026-02-02
SNELL ERIK STOREY
Officer
$2.80M
@ $71.01 · 2026-01-16
BELLEMARE ALAIN
Officer
$2.49M
@ $69.21 · 2026-01-15
CARTER PETER W
Officer
$1.01M
@ $70.30 · 2026-01-15
BASTIAN EDWARD H
Chief Executive Officer
$12.30M
@ $71.00 · 2026-01-15
SAMANT RAHUL D
Chief Technology Officer
$3.97M
@ $69.57 · 2026-01-14
SEAR STEVEN M
Officer
$2.18M
@ $69.69 · 2026-01-14
HAUENSTEIN GLEN W
President
$1.40M
@ $70.00 · 2026-01-14
LAUGHTER JOHN E.
Chief Operating Officer
$1.45M
@ $62.33 · 2025-10-21
CARROLL WILLIAM C
Officer
$858,070
@ $61.25 · 2025-10-15
HAUENSTEIN GLEN W
President
$613,070
@ $61.31 · 2025-08-27
HUERTA MICHAEL P
Director
$151,762
@ $60.70 · 2025-08-19
BASTIAN EDWARD H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.97M
@ $56.28 · 2025-07-23
CARTER PETER W
Officer
$1.00M
@ $57.19 · 2025-07-15
SEAR STEVEN M
Officer
$1.01M
@ $55.96 · 2025-07-15
BELLEMARE ALAIN
Officer
$2.52M
@ $55.56 · 2025-07-11
SAMANT RAHUL D
Officer
$2.47M
@ $64.89 · 2025-02-11
SAMANT RAHUL D
Chief Technology Officer
$1.24M
@ $69.08 · 2025-02-05
CARROLL WILLIAM C
Officer
$447,285
@ $65.94 · 2025-02-03
BASTIAN EDWARD H
Chief Executive Officer
$6.41M
@ $69.85 · 2025-01-22
CARROLL WILLIAM C
Officer
$554,534
@ $66.02 · 2025-01-17
SMITH JOANNE D
Officer
$1.53M
@ $64.00 · 2024-11-21
CARROLL WILLIAM C
Officer
$1.31M
@ $60.62 · 2024-11-08
SAMANT RAHUL D
Officer
$1.16M
@ $62.13 · 2024-11-07
AUSBAND ALLISON C
Officer
$470,306
@ $62.62 · 2024-11-06
HAUENSTEIN GLEN W
President
$2.50M
@ $62.56 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
DAL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
DAL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View DAL Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: DAL vs INTC

Is Delta Air Lines, Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DAL trades at a 81.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $441 vs. price $80), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Delta Air Lines, Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

DAL scores 65/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Delta Air Lines, Inc. in financial distress?▼

DAL's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Delta Air Lines, Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) generates a 7.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Delta Air Lines, Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

DAL earns 9.6% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

DAL vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io