Compare StocksD vs MS

Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, D is overvalued at $69, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. MS is undervalued at $210, with an intrinsic value of $269 and a margin of safety of 22%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

D
Dominion Energy, Inc.
$69.17
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$210.42

Rewards

D
    MS
    • Gross margin of 87.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    D
    • PEG ratio of 2.95 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • High leverage (1.60x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    MS
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Insiders have sold $5.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    D
    MS
    Valuation
    $-9.18B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    -15.09%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    23.93
    Trailing P/E
    17.01
    18.13
    Forward P/E
    15.45
    Quality & Moat
    4.78%
    ROIC
    3.68%
    8.28%
    ROE
    14.08%
    46.22%
    Gross Margin
    87.64%
    2.95
    PEG Ratio
    1.99
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.60
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    6.43
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    3.86%
    Dividend Yield
    2.19%
    D: 2Ties: 1MS: 6
    DMS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    D

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    D
    $1.22
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $244.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$298.4M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MS
    $6.65
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $20.84B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$138.59B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    D
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $69.17
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MS
    21.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 21.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $210.42
    Fair Value: $269.50
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    D

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    D
    44/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    MS
    80/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    D
    -2.47
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MS
    -2.09
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    D
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.7%Retail & Other 17.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,895
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MS
    Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.1%Retail & Other 12.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,329
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    D
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $250,557
    BLUE ROBERT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $250,557
    @ $60.35 · 2025-08-27
    SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
    Director
    $25,655
    @ $54.01 · 2025-03-13
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5,630
    PETERSON DOUGLAS L
    Director
    $5,630
    @ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    D
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MS
    2
    Sells (3M)
    14
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $64.71M
    SCHAPIRO MARY L
    Director
    $212,055
    @ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $5.21M
    @ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $2.12M
    @ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $2.78M
    @ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $9.74M
    @ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
    CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
    Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $6.02M
    @ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $3.69M
    @ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $5.57M
    @ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $3.97M
    @ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
    CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
    Officer
    $1.44M
    @ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
    YESHAYA SHARON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
    SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
    Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
    PICK EDWARD N.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.43M
    @ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $1.69M
    @ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
    SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
    Officer
    $2.81M
    @ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $4.09M
    @ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $3.70M
    @ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $4.80M
    @ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
    HERZ ROBERT H
    Director
    $95,459
    @ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
    CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
    Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $2.52M
    @ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $4.20M
    @ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
    AKRAM RAJA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.38M
    @ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $5.00M
    @ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    D
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    D
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    MS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View D Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: D vs MS

    Is Dominion Energy, Inc. or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 21.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $269 vs. price $210), compared to D's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $69).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Dominion Energy, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

    MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while D scores 44/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

    MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. D scores 0.7 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Dominion Energy, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

    D earns 4.8% ROIC versus MS's 3.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Dominion Energy, Inc.'s or Morgan Stanley's?

    MS's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to D's 40/100 (Borderline). MS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    D vs MS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io