Compare Stocks › D vs META

Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) vs Meta Platforms, Inc. (META): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, D is overvalued at $67, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. META is undervalued at $615, with an intrinsic value of $964 and a margin of safety of 36%. Of the two, META has the wider margin of safety.

D
Dominion Energy, Inc.
$66.62
VS
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$614.99

Rewards

D
    META
    • ★Meta Platforms, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • ★Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • ★Meta Platforms, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    D
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.59 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.66 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    META
    • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • ⚠FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • ⚠Insiders have sold $7.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    D
    META
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $46.11B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    2.93%
    21.99
    Trailing P/E
    20.98
    17.46
    Forward P/E
    17.28
    Quality & Moat
    N/A
    ROIC
    17.46%
    N/A
    ROE
    32.26%
    42.94%
    Gross Margin
    81.03%
    2.59
    PEG Ratio
    0.80
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.12
    No debt
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.00
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.28
    4.01%
    Dividend Yield
    0.34%
    D: 2Ties: 2META: 2
    DMETA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    D

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    META

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    D
    $1.22
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $244.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$298.4M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    META
    $8.94
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $151.52B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.36T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    D
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $66.62
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    META
    36.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 36.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $614.99
    Fair Value: $963.95
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    D

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    META

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $615?

    +11.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.2%

    The market implies +11.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +15.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    D
    44/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    META
    80/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    D
    -2.47
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    META
    -3.04
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    D
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.9%Retail & Other 16.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,933
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    META
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 77.5%Retail & Other 22.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders6,645
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    D
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    BLUE ROBERT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $250,557
    @ $60.35 · 2025-08-27
    SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
    Director
    $25,655
    @ $54.01 · 2025-03-13
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    META
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    D
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    META
    3
    Sells (3M)
    39
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.55M
    ANDERSON AARON
    Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $618.06 · 2026-09-03
    BOSWORTH ANDREW
    Chief Technology Officer
    $4.38M
    @ $558.00 · 2026-08-18
    MAHONEY CURTIS J
    Officer
    $847,581
    @ $543.67 · 2026-08-18
    KIMMITT ROBERT M
    Director
    $280,780
    @ $561.56 · 2026-08-03
    KIMMITT ROBERT M
    Director
    $303,875
    @ $607.75 · 2026-07-01
    KIMMITT ROBERT M
    Director
    $317,162
    @ $629.29 · 2026-06-01
    MAHONEY CURTIS J
    Officer
    $1.27M
    @ $609.92 · 2026-05-27
    BOSWORTH ANDREW
    Chief Technology Officer
    $4.77M
    @ $607.83 · 2026-05-18
    KIMMITT ROBERT M
    Director
    $386,860
    @ $667.00 · 2026-04-15
    KIMMITT ROBERT M
    Director
    $366,572
    @ $632.02 · 2026-03-16
    BOSWORTH ANDREW
    Chief Technology Officer
    $5.11M
    @ $631.24 · 2026-02-18
    KIMMITT ROBERT M
    Director
    $370,724
    @ $639.18 · 2026-02-17
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $342,869
    @ $663.19 · 2026-02-09
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $369,448
    @ $714.60 · 2026-02-02
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $343,805
    @ $665.00 · 2026-01-26
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $314,517
    @ $608.35 · 2026-01-20
    KIMMITT ROBERT M
    Director
    $358,602
    @ $618.28 · 2026-01-15
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $337,601
    @ $653.00 · 2026-01-12
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $336,262
    @ $650.41 · 2026-01-05
    NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
    Officer
    $341,860
    @ $658.69 · 2025-12-30
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $340,258
    @ $658.14 · 2025-12-29
    NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
    Officer
    $342,218
    @ $659.38 · 2025-12-23
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $341,794
    @ $661.11 · 2025-12-22
    NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
    Officer
    $333,836
    @ $643.23 · 2025-12-16
    KIMMITT ROBERT M
    Director
    $374,680
    @ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $333,982
    @ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
    NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
    Officer
    $344,699
    @ $664.16 · 2025-12-09
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $346,199
    @ $669.63 · 2025-12-08
    NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
    Officer
    $333,312
    @ $642.22 · 2025-12-02
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $330,379
    @ $639.03 · 2025-12-01
    NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
    Officer
    $323,929
    @ $624.14 · 2025-11-25
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $309,445
    @ $598.54 · 2025-11-24
    BOSWORTH ANDREW
    Chief Technology Officer
    $6.94M
    @ $593.31 · 2025-11-18
    NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
    Officer
    $307,040
    @ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
    ANDERSON AARON
    Officer
    $429,502
    @ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
    KIMMITT ROBERT M
    Director
    $365,610
    @ $609.35 · 2025-11-17
    OLIVAN JAVIER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.90M
    @ $608.60 · 2025-11-17
    BOSWORTH ANDREW
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.09M
    @ $609.46 · 2025-11-14
    NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
    Officer
    $325,596
    @ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    D
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    META
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    D
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    META
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    View D Full AnalysisView META Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: D vs META

    Is Dominion Energy, Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, META trades at a 36.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $964 vs. price $615), compared to D's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $67).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Dominion Energy, Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc.?▼

    META scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while D scores 44/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Dominion Energy, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    D's Altman Z-Score of 0.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. META scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which dividend is safer, Dominion Energy, Inc.'s or Meta Platforms, Inc.'s?▼

    META's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to D's 40/100 (Borderline). META has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    D vs META: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io