Compare Stocks › D vs MA

Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) vs Mastercard Incorporated (MA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, D is overvalued at $67, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. MA is overvalued at $638, with an intrinsic value of $563 and a margin of safety of -13%. Of the two, MA has the wider margin of safety.

D
Dominion Energy, Inc.
$66.62
VS
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$638.01

Rewards

D
    MA
    • ★Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • ★Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • ★Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    D
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.59 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.66 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    MA
    • ⚠FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • ⚠High leverage (2.00x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • ⚠9 insider sales totaling $24.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    D
    MA
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $16.63B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    2.99%
    21.99
    Trailing P/E
    33.39
    17.46
    Forward P/E
    27.58
    Quality & Moat
    N/A
    ROIC
    56.56%
    N/A
    ROE
    231.37%
    42.94%
    Gross Margin
    100.00%
    2.59
    PEG Ratio
    1.66
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    2.00
    No debt
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.00
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.59
    4.01%
    Dividend Yield
    0.55%
    D: 4MA: 2
    DMA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    D

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    D
    $1.22
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $244.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$298.4M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MA
    $5.62
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $31.68B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$177.96B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    D
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $66.62
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MA
    13.3% Overvalued
    Price is 13.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $638.01
    Fair Value: $562.90
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    D

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $638?

    +16.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.0%

    The market implies +16.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +15.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    D
    44/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    MA
    99/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    D
    -2.47
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MA
    -2.53
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    D
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.9%Retail & Other 16.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,933
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MA
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.1%Retail & Other 8.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,838
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    D
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    BLUE ROBERT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $250,557
    @ $60.35 · 2025-08-27
    SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
    Director
    $25,655
    @ $54.01 · 2025-03-13
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    D
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MA
    9
    Sells (3M)
    16
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $69.73M
    LING HAI
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.68M
    @ $620.00 · 2026-10-16
    GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
    Director
    $435,418
    @ $587.61 · 2026-10-12
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Officer
    $1.91M
    @ $584.00 · 2026-09-02
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $547,837
    @ $593.54 · 2026-08-31
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Officer
    $4.87M
    @ $576.53 · 2026-08-20
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $673,201
    @ $565.24 · 2026-08-17
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.84M
    @ $575.00 · 2026-08-05
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Officer
    $1.72M
    @ $571.87 · 2026-08-05
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $570.31 · 2026-08-04
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $19.08M
    @ $573.84 · 2026-08-03
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $185,760
    @ $540.00 · 2026-07-15
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $10.59M
    @ $534.87 · 2026-07-15
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $216,000
    @ $540.00 · 2026-07-07
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $3.58M
    @ $526.37 · 2026-07-02
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $7.49M
    @ $525.19 · 2026-07-01
    LING HAI
    Officer
    $4.48M
    @ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.20M
    @ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
    LING HAI
    Officer
    $2.69M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.46M
    @ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
    GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
    Director
    $178,049
    @ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $536,480
    @ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $601,447
    @ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $536,480
    @ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
    GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
    Director
    $173,910
    @ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $5.02M
    @ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $508,474
    @ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $549,373
    @ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $5.55M
    @ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $8.22M
    @ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $218,223
    @ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $257,535
    @ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.68M
    @ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $3.81M
    @ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $6.12M
    @ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.78M
    @ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $6.19M
    @ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $7.97M
    @ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.17M
    @ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $6.18M
    @ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    D
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MA
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    D
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    MA
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View D Full AnalysisView MA Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: D vs MA

    Is Dominion Energy, Inc. or Mastercard Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MA trades at a -13.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $563 vs. price $638), compared to D's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $67).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Dominion Energy, Inc. or Mastercard Incorporated?▼

    MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while D scores 44/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Dominion Energy, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    D's Altman Z-Score of 0.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MA scores 10.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which dividend is safer, Dominion Energy, Inc.'s or Mastercard Incorporated's?▼

    MA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to D's 40/100 (Borderline). MA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    D vs MA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io