Compare StocksD vs INTU

Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, D is overvalued at $69, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. INTU is undervalued at $316, with an intrinsic value of $536 and a margin of safety of 41%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

D
Dominion Energy, Inc.
$69.17
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$316.07

Rewards

D
    INTU
    • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    D
    • PEG ratio of 2.95 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • High leverage (1.60x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    INTU
    • FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    D
    INTU
    Valuation
    $-9.18B
    Free Cash Flow
    $5.23B
    -15.09%
    FCF Yield
    6.05%
    23.93
    Trailing P/E
    19.27
    18.13
    Forward P/E
    11.56
    Quality & Moat
    4.78%
    ROIC
    28.21%
    8.28%
    ROE
    22.50%
    46.22%
    Gross Margin
    80.79%
    2.95
    PEG Ratio
    0.82
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.60
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.01
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    6.43
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.02
    3.86%
    Dividend Yield
    1.52%
    D: 1Ties: 1INTU: 10
    DINTU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    D

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    D
    $1.22
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $244.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$298.4M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTU
    $12.31
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.10B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$75.17B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    D
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $69.17
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTU
    41.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 41.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $316.07
    Fair Value: $536.01
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    D

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $316?

    +7.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +5.1%

    The market implies +7.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    D
    44/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTU
    79/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    D
    -2.47
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTU
    -2.65
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    D
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.7%Retail & Other 17.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,895
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 91.6%Retail & Other 6.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,638
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    D
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $250,557
    BLUE ROBERT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $250,557
    @ $60.35 · 2025-08-27
    SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
    Director
    $25,655
    @ $54.01 · 2025-03-13
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTU
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    D
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.62M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $228,121
    @ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    D
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(35/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    D
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
    View D Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: D vs INTU

    Is Dominion Energy, Inc. or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 41.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $536 vs. price $316), compared to D's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $69).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Dominion Energy, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

    INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat), while D scores 44/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Dominion Energy, Inc. in financial distress?

    D's Altman Z-Score of 0.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 8.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Dominion Energy, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 6.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Dominion Energy, Inc.'s -15.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Dominion Energy, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

    INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus D's 4.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Dominion Energy, Inc.'s or Intuit Inc.'s?

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to D's 40/100 (Borderline). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.