Compare StocksCVX vs T

Chevron Corporation (CVX) vs AT&T Inc. (T): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-05, CVX is overvalued at $190, with a DCF intrinsic value of $139 and a margin of safety of -37%. T is undervalued at $23, with an intrinsic value of $56 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, T has the wider margin of safety.

CVX
Chevron Corporation
$190.40
VS
T
AT&T Inc.
$23.38

Rewards

CVX
  • PEG ratio of 0.78 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
T
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 16.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $14.89 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • FCF yield of 12.1% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

CVX
  • ROIC has declined by 11.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • 25 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
T
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.89 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CVX
T
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$19.44B
N/A
FCF Yield
12.14%
18.59
Trailing P/E
7.79
14.72
Forward P/E
9.12
Quality & Moat
15.46%
ROIC
8.47%
6.49%
ROE
18.34%
44.26%
Gross Margin
59.72%
0.78
PEG Ratio
1.57
Balance Sheet Safety
0.21
Net Debt / Equity
1.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.79
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.30
3.62%
Dividend Yield
4.71%
CVX: 4Ties: 1T: 5
CVXT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CVX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

T

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CVX
$-2.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$15.44B
Δ Market Cap
$-39.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
T
$1.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$22.78B
Δ Market Cap
+$43.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CVX
98.7% Overvalued
Price is 98.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $190.40
Fair Value: $95.81
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
T
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $23.38
Fair Value: $55.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CVX

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

T

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $23?

+2.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +2.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CVX
43/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
T
57/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CVX
-3.12
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
T
-2.78
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CVX
Insiders 4.7%Institutions 70.3%Retail & Other 25.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,952
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
T
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.9%Retail & Other 30.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,496
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CVX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
T
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CVX
0
Sells (3M)
25
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $216.65M
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$8.57M
@ $213.30 · 2026-03-30
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$9.07M
@ $192.12 · 2026-03-06
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $188.58 · 2026-03-02
NELSON MARK A.
Officer
$26.23M
@ $187.92 · 2026-03-02
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$8.60M
@ $187.78 · 2026-03-02
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$51.62M
@ $189.35 · 2026-03-02
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$17.54M
@ $187.67 · 2026-03-02
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$1.24M
@ $186.04 · 2026-02-27
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$268,950
@ $183.83 · 2026-02-18
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$441,327
@ $183.28 · 2026-02-18
BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
Chief Technology Officer
$2.25M
@ $184.21 · 2026-02-13
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$122,144
@ $183.40 · 2026-02-12
BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.07M
@ $178.43 · 2026-02-03
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$3.92M
@ $176.53 · 2026-02-03
NELSON MARK A.
Officer
$7.98M
@ $174.17 · 2026-02-02
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$5.62M
@ $175.01 · 2026-01-30
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$7.26M
@ $176.40 · 2026-01-30
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$544,000
@ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$537,600
@ $168.00 · 2026-01-14
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$1.31M
@ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$4.68M
@ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$52.27M
@ $162.99 · 2026-01-05
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$1.40M
@ $150.27 · 2025-11-21
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$636,480
@ $160.00 · 2025-08-29
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$1.42M
@ $152.50 · 2025-02-07
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$26.36M
@ $160.13 · 2024-11-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
T
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
SABRINA SANDERS S
Officer
$41,348
@ $27.57 · 2025-05-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CVX
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
T
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CVX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
T
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View CVX Full AnalysisView T Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CVX vs T

Is Chevron Corporation or AT&T Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, T trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $56 vs. price $23), compared to CVX's -37.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $139 vs. $190).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Chevron Corporation or AT&T Inc.?

T scores 57/100 (Narrow moat), while CVX scores 43/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is AT&T Inc. in financial distress?

T's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CVX scores 3.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Chevron Corporation or AT&T Inc.?

CVX earns 15.5% ROIC versus T's 8.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Chevron Corporation's or AT&T Inc.'s?

T's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to CVX's 30/100 (Unsafe). T has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.