Compare StocksCVX vs LMT

Chevron Corporation (CVX) vs Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CVX is overvalued at $174, with a DCF intrinsic value of $139 and a margin of safety of -25%. LMT is overvalued at $511, with an intrinsic value of $381 and a margin of safety of -34%. Of the two, CVX has the wider margin of safety.

CVX
Chevron Corporation
$173.63
VS
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
$510.95

Rewards

CVX
  • PEG ratio of 0.73 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
LMT
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

CVX
  • ROIC has declined by 11.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Trailing P/E of 30.2x is 99% above the historical average of 15.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
LMT
  • Gross margin of 9.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • High leverage (2.51x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CVX
LMT
Valuation
$16.59B
Free Cash Flow
$6.91B
4.80%
FCF Yield
5.86%
30.20
Trailing P/E
24.77
13.82
Forward P/E
15.92
Quality & Moat
4.57%
ROIC
23.16%
6.64%
ROE
67.64%
42.42%
Gross Margin
9.91%
0.73
PEG Ratio
1.13
Balance Sheet Safety
0.21
Net Debt / Equity
2.51
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.35
3.95%
Dividend Yield
2.54%
CVX: 7Ties: 1LMT: 4
CVXLMT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CVX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LMT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CVX
$-2.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$15.44B
Δ Market Cap
$-39.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LMT
$-1.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$8.03B
Δ Market Cap
$-12.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CVX
81.2% Overvalued
Price is 81.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $173.63
Fair Value: $95.81
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LMT
34.0% Overvalued
Price is 34.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $510.95
Fair Value: $381.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CVX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $174?

+11.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

LMT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $511?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.5%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CVX
43/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LMT
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CVX
-3.12
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LMT
-2.23
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CVX
Insiders 4.7%Institutions 70.7%Retail & Other 24.6%
No. of Institutional Holders5,097
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LMT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.0%Retail & Other 23.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,414
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CVX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LMT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CVX
1
Sells (3M)
25
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $216.65M
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$8.57M
@ $213.30 · 2026-03-30
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$9.07M
@ $192.12 · 2026-03-06
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$51.62M
@ $189.35 · 2026-03-02
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$17.54M
@ $187.67 · 2026-03-02
NELSON MARK A.
Officer
$26.23M
@ $187.92 · 2026-03-02
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$2.19M
@ $188.58 · 2026-03-02
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$8.60M
@ $187.78 · 2026-03-02
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$1.24M
@ $186.04 · 2026-02-27
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$268,950
@ $183.83 · 2026-02-18
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$441,327
@ $183.28 · 2026-02-18
BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
Chief Technology Officer
$2.25M
@ $184.21 · 2026-02-13
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$122,144
@ $183.40 · 2026-02-12
WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
Officer
$3.92M
@ $176.53 · 2026-02-03
BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.07M
@ $178.43 · 2026-02-03
NELSON MARK A.
Officer
$7.98M
@ $174.17 · 2026-02-02
PATE ROBERT HEWITT
Officer
$7.26M
@ $176.40 · 2026-01-30
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$5.62M
@ $175.01 · 2026-01-30
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$544,000
@ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$537,600
@ $168.00 · 2026-01-14
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$52.27M
@ $162.99 · 2026-01-05
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$1.31M
@ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
BONNER EIMEAR P
Chief Financial Officer
$4.68M
@ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$1.40M
@ $150.27 · 2025-11-21
KNOWLES ALANA K.
Officer
$636,480
@ $160.00 · 2025-08-29
GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
Officer
$1.42M
@ $152.50 · 2025-02-07
WIRTH MICHAEL K
Chief Executive Officer
$26.36M
@ $160.13 · 2024-11-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LMT
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.29M
CAHILL TIMOTHY S
Officer
$3.00M
@ $649.47 · 2026-03-11
ULMER GREGORY M
Officer
$1.87M
@ $658.08 · 2026-02-27
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$1.59M
@ $660.64 · 2026-02-24
ST JOHN FRANK A
Chief Operating Officer
$3.83M
@ $491.04 · 2025-10-23
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$2.12M
@ $442.51 · 2025-02-26
LIGHTFOOT ROBERT M JR
Officer
$1.42M
@ $442.42 · 2025-02-26
PAUL HARRY EDWARD III
Officer
$312,923
@ $442.61 · 2025-02-26
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$1.78M
@ $542.72 · 2024-08-01
CAHILL TIMOTHY S
Officer
$2.05M
@ $515.36 · 2024-07-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CVX
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LMT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CVX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
LMT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View CVX Full AnalysisView LMT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CVX vs LMT

Is Chevron Corporation or Lockheed Martin Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CVX trades at a -25.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $139 vs. price $174), compared to LMT's -34.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $381 vs. $511).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Chevron Corporation or Lockheed Martin Corporation?

LMT scores 74/100 (Wide moat), while CVX scores 43/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Chevron Corporation or Lockheed Martin Corporation?

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) generates a 5.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Chevron Corporation's 4.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Chevron Corporation or Lockheed Martin Corporation?

LMT earns 23.2% ROIC versus CVX's 4.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Chevron Corporation's or Lockheed Martin Corporation's?

LMT's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to CVX's 30/100 (Unsafe). LMT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.