Compare StocksCTSH vs PFE

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

CTSH
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
$61.55
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.41

Rewards

CTSH
  • Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.22 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Dividend yield of 6.28% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

CTSH
  • 10 insider sales totaling $2.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CTSH
PFE
Valuation
$2.60B
Free Cash Flow
$13.43B
8.74%
FCF Yield
8.61%
13.50
Trailing P/E
20.15
10.02
Forward P/E
9.69
Quality & Moat
16.48%
ROIC
7.67%
14.85%
ROE
8.96%
33.72%
Gross Margin
75.81%
0.61
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.08
Debt / Equity
0.78
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.10
2.14%
Dividend Yield
6.28%
CTSH: 5Ties: 3PFE: 3
CTSHPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CTSH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CTSH
$2.22
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.79B
Δ Market Cap
+$10.65B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CTSH
41.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 41.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.55
Fair Value: $105.62
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
140.2% Overvalued
Price is 140.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.41
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CTSH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $62?

+1.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.3%

The market implies +1.8% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies -0.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.3%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CTSH
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CTSH
-2.44
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CTSH
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 104.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,543
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.7%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,693
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CTSH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CTSH
10
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.01M
KERDMAN ALINA
Officer
$7,962
@ $60.78 · 2026-03-16
KERDMAN ALINA
Officer
$9,537
@ $63.16 · 2026-03-02
KERDMAN ALINA
Officer
$10,680
@ $66.75 · 2026-02-17
GUMMADI SURYA KUMARI
Officer
$143,523
@ $83.06 · 2026-02-02
PATSALOS-FOX MICHAEL
Director
$168,460
@ $84.23 · 2026-01-07
PATSALOS-FOX MICHAEL
Director
$245,744
@ $81.91 · 2026-01-05
GUMMADI SURYA KUMARI
Officer
$569,962
@ $81.42 · 2026-01-02
KERDMAN ALINA
Officer
$17,080
@ $84.14 · 2025-12-31
PATSALOS-FOX MICHAEL
Director
$255,514
@ $85.17 · 2025-12-29
PATSALOS-FOX MICHAEL
Director
$596,650
@ $85.24 · 2025-12-24
SINGISETTI RAVI KUMAR
Chief Executive Officer
$250,935
@ $85.06 · 2025-12-19
PATSALOS-FOX MICHAEL
Director
$251,571
@ $83.86 · 2025-12-15
KERDMAN ALINA
Officer
$11,063
@ $84.45 · 2025-12-15
KIM JOHN SUNSHIN
Officer
$418,405
@ $83.68 · 2025-12-12
PATSALOS-FOX MICHAEL
Director
$584,653
@ $83.52 · 2025-12-11
SINGISETTI RAVI KUMAR
Chief Executive Officer
$250,039
@ $80.01 · 2025-12-04
KIM JOHN SUNSHIN
Officer
$200,000
@ $80.00 · 2025-12-04
GUMMADI SURYA KUMARI
Officer
$544,890
@ $77.84 · 2025-12-01
KERDMAN ALINA
Officer
$11,695
@ $77.45 · 2025-12-01
GUMMADI SURYA KUMARI
Officer
$539,578
@ $77.08 · 2025-11-26
KERDMAN ALINA
Officer
$11,350
@ $70.94 · 2025-11-18
KIM JOHN SUNSHIN
Officer
$187,950
@ $75.18 · 2025-10-29
PATSALOS-FOX MICHAEL
Director
$504,823
@ $72.48 · 2025-08-28
KERDMAN ALINA
Officer
$30,897
@ $70.38 · 2025-08-19
SINGISETTI RAVI KUMAR
Chief Executive Officer
$383,675
@ $71.05 · 2025-08-04
GUMMADI SURYA KUMARI
Officer
$399,744
@ $71.38 · 2025-08-04
KIM JOHN SUNSHIN
Officer
$401,200
@ $80.24 · 2025-06-02
KIM JOHN SUNSHIN
Officer
$417,986
@ $83.60 · 2025-03-03
KIM JOHN SUNSHIN
Officer
$417,986
@ $83.60 · 2025-03-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CTSH
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CTSH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View CTSH Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis