Compare StocksCTRA vs INTC

Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
$33.90
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

CTRA
  • Gross margin of 74.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • PEG ratio of 0.73 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
INTC

    Risks

    CTRA
    • ROIC has declined by 16.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Coterra Energy Inc. scores only 22/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.50 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.63B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    6.35%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    15.13
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    12.44
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    9.77%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    11.57%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    74.12%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    0.73
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.27
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.81
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    2.60%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    CTRA: 7Ties: 2INTC: 0
    CTRAINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CTRA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    $0.50
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $2.27B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.13B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    50.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 50.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $33.90
    Fair Value: $68.78
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CTRA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $34?

    +5.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +6.4%

    The market implies +5.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    22/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    -2.79
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    Insiders 1.5%Institutions 96.5%Retail & Other 2.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,214
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    0
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.18M
    BELL STEPHEN P
    Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $25.26 · 2025-05-20
    BELL STEPHEN P
    Officer
    $2.65M
    @ $23.00 · 2025-05-08
    SMITH KEVIN WILLIAM
    Chief Technology Officer
    $748,444
    @ $29.08 · 2025-03-19
    VELA ADAM M
    General Counsel
    $230,120
    @ $28.77 · 2025-03-18
    SIRGO BLAKE A
    Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $28.13 · 2025-03-17
    ROEMER TODD M
    Officer
    $1.33M
    @ $27.68 · 2025-03-14
    BELL STEPHEN P
    Officer
    $2.15M
    @ $27.00 · 2025-03-11
    DESHAZER MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $941,913
    @ $26.63 · 2025-03-10
    BELL STEPHEN P
    Officer
    $1.95M
    @ $26.02 · 2025-03-06
    SMITH KEVIN WILLIAM
    Chief Technology Officer
    $775,461
    @ $26.16 · 2024-12-03
    VELA ADAM M
    General Counsel
    $439,801
    @ $26.76 · 2024-11-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(70/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CTRA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View CTRA Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io