Compare StocksCSX vs INTU

CSX Corporation (CSX) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CSX is overvalued at $48, with a DCF intrinsic value of $36 and a margin of safety of -31%. INTU is undervalued at $317, with an intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

CSX
CSX Corporation
$47.66
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$316.63

Rewards

CSX
  • CSX Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

CSX
  • FCF yield of 2.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 27.7x is 48% above the historical average of 18.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Insiders have sold $2.3M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
INTU

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CSX
    INTU
    Valuation
    $1.95B
    Free Cash Flow
    $8.62B
    2.21%
    FCF Yield
    10.18%
    27.71
    Trailing P/E
    19.25
    20.98
    Forward P/E
    11.58
    Quality & Moat
    13.13%
    ROIC
    10.90%
    24.36%
    ROE
    23.60%
    47.07%
    Gross Margin
    80.98%
    1.76
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.28
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.06
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.64
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.18
    1.17%
    Dividend Yield
    1.74%
    CSX: 1Ties: 2INTU: 9
    CSXINTU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CSX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CSX
    $0.47
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $7.24B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.41B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTU
    $-11.53
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-90.29B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CSX
    30.8% Overvalued
    Price is 30.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $47.66
    Fair Value: $36.44
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTU
    44.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 44.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $316.63
    Fair Value: $565.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CSX

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $48?

    +16.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +21.4%

    The market implies +16.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +21.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $317?

    +5.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.9%

    The market implies +5.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CSX
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CSX
    -2.69
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CSX
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 81.6%Retail & Other 18.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,544
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CSX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.03M
    ANGEL STEPHEN F
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $40.27 · 2026-03-06
    ANGEL STEPHEN F
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $36.87 · 2025-10-20
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CSX
    2
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $18.60M
    BURNS MICHAEL S.
    Officer
    $684,840
    @ $52.68 · 2026-07-24
    WILLIAMS ANGELA C
    Officer
    $1.60M
    @ $53.29 · 2026-07-24
    BOONE KEVIN S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.38M
    @ $46.70 · 2026-06-03
    ZILLMER JOHN J
    Director
    $464,500
    @ $46.45 · 2026-06-03
    SORFLEET DIANA B
    Officer
    $3.74M
    @ $41.56 · 2026-02-19
    FORTUNE STEPHEN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.22M
    @ $38.65 · 2026-02-03
    SORFLEET DIANA B
    Officer
    $2.50M
    @ $37.48 · 2026-01-28
    BOONE KEVIN S
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $36.09 · 2025-10-22
    BURNS MICHAEL S.
    Officer
    $891,393
    @ $36.76 · 2025-10-20
    FORTUNE STEPHEN
    Officer
    $47,115
    @ $31.41 · 2025-03-04
    GOLDMAN NATHAN DOUGLAS
    Officer
    $4.20M
    @ $35.39 · 2024-11-18
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.34M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CSX
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CSX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    View CSX Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CSX vs INTU

    Is CSX Corporation or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 44.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $565 vs. price $317), compared to CSX's -30.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $36 vs. $48).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, CSX Corporation or Intuit Inc.?

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while CSX scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is CSX Corporation in financial distress?

    CSX's Altman Z-Score of 2.3 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 4.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, CSX Corporation or Intuit Inc.?

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.2% free cash flow yield, compared to CSX Corporation's 2.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, CSX Corporation or Intuit Inc.?

    CSX earns 13.1% ROIC versus INTU's 10.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, CSX Corporation's or Intuit Inc.'s?

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CSX's 94/100 (Very Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    CSX vs INTU: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io