Compare StocksCSX vs GOOGL

CSX Corporation (CSX) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)

CSX
CSX Corporation
$38.49
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$307.13

Rewards

CSX
  • CSX Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Dividend yield of 1.45% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

CSX
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.47 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 2.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 25.0x is 34% above the historical average of 18.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CSX
GOOGL
Valuation
$1.71B
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
2.39%
FCF Yield
1.97%
24.99
Trailing P/E
28.41
18.44
Forward P/E
22.88
Quality & Moat
11.15%
ROIC
20.83%
21.95%
ROE
31.83%
45.59%
Gross Margin
59.65%
N/A
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
1.48
Debt / Equity
0.16
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.93
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.40
1.45%
Dividend Yield
0.27%
CSX: 4Ties: 1GOOGL: 6
CSXGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CSX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CSX
$0.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$7.24B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CSX
8.9% Overvalued
Price is 8.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $38.49
Fair Value: $35.36
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
20.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.13
Fair Value: $384.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CSX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $38?

+13.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.9%

The market implies +13.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +20.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.2%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CSX
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CSX
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CSX
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 80.9%Retail & Other 18.8%
No. of Institutional Holders2,311
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,206
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CSX
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.03M
ANGEL STEPHEN F
Chief Executive Officer
$1.01M
@ $40.27 · 2026-03-06
ANGEL STEPHEN F
Chief Executive Officer
$2.03M
@ $36.87 · 2025-10-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CSX
3
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.47M
SORFLEET DIANA B
Officer
$3.74M
@ $41.56 · 2026-02-19
FORTUNE STEPHEN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.22M
@ $38.65 · 2026-02-03
SORFLEET DIANA B
Officer
$2.50M
@ $37.48 · 2026-01-28
BOONE KEVIN S
Officer
$1.12M
@ $36.09 · 2025-10-22
BURNS MICHAEL S.
Officer
$891,393
@ $36.76 · 2025-10-20
FORTUNE STEPHEN
Officer
$47,115
@ $31.41 · 2025-03-04
GOLDMAN NATHAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$4.20M
@ $35.39 · 2024-11-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CSX
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CSX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View CSX Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis
CSX Corporation (CSX) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io