Compare StocksCSGP vs INTC

CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
$34.72
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

CSGP
  • Gross margin of 78.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • 4 insider purchases totaling $3.5M with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
  • Trailing P/E of 496.0x is 47% below the historical average of 937.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
INTC

    Risks

    CSGP
    • ROIC has declined by 5.1 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • FCF yield of 1.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 52.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    INTC
    Valuation
    $202.20M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    1.43%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    496.00
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    19.55
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    0.10%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    0.09%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    78.63%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    0.15
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.15
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.22
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    CSGP: 8Ties: 1INTC: 1
    CSGPINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CSGP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    $-6.39
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $521.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-3.33B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    2392.1% Overvalued
    Price is 2392.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $34.72
    Fair Value: $1.39
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CSGP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $35?

    +60.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +24.8%

    The market implies +60.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +24.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    37/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    -2.07
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    Insiders 1.2%Institutions 109.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,183
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    4
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.48M
    SAMS LOUISE S.
    Director
    $48,360
    @ $48.36 · 2026-03-06
    SAINT FREDERICK G
    Officer
    $906,600
    @ $45.33 · 2026-03-02
    GLASER RACHEL C
    Director
    $44,940
    @ $44.94 · 2026-03-02
    FLORANCE ANDREW COLDEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.48M
    @ $44.52 · 2026-02-27
    FLORANCE ANDREW COLDEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $74.67 · 2024-10-25
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    0
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.09M
    HILL JOHN W
    Director
    $154,530
    @ $68.68 · 2025-11-13
    CANN CYNTHIA CAMMETT
    Officer
    $126,642
    @ $68.79 · 2025-11-13
    SAINT FREDERICK G
    Officer
    $2.26M
    @ $90.33 · 2025-08-28
    CANN CYNTHIA CAMMETT
    Officer
    $188,764
    @ $92.85 · 2025-07-28
    SAINT FREDERICK G
    Officer
    $2.33M
    @ $93.23 · 2025-07-28
    SAINT FREDERICK G
    Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $81.10 · 2025-06-11
    CANN CYNTHIA CAMMETT
    Officer
    $334,259
    @ $78.48 · 2025-03-10
    HILL JOHN W
    Director
    $209,939
    @ $76.76 · 2024-12-10
    NASSETTA CHRISTOPHER J
    Director
    $135,136
    @ $80.39 · 2024-11-27
    DESMARAIS MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $439,340
    @ $79.88 · 2024-11-26
    KLEIN MICHAEL R
    Director
    $5.35M
    @ $74.69 · 2024-10-25
    HILL JOHN W
    Director
    $103,562
    @ $78.16 · 2024-07-30
    SAINT FREDERICK G
    Officer
    $221,075
    @ $88.43 · 2024-05-16
    RUGGLES LISA C.
    Officer
    $1.82M
    @ $91.15 · 2024-05-09
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(30/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CSGP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View CSGP Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    CSGP vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io