Compare StocksCRM vs ZBH

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH)

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$185.85
VS
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
$83.22

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.49 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
ZBH
  • Gross margin of 70.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.57 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Dividend yield of 1.16% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
ZBH
Valuation
$16.37B
Free Cash Flow
$1.42B
10.76%
FCF Yield
8.82%
23.86
Trailing P/E
21.56
12.45
Forward P/E
9.25
Quality & Moat
8.21%
ROIC
6.45%
12.61%
ROE
5.56%
77.68%
Gross Margin
70.18%
1.33
PEG Ratio
0.63
Balance Sheet Safety
0.30
Debt / Equity
0.60
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.65
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.75
0.96%
Dividend Yield
1.16%
CRM: 7Ties: 1ZBH: 4
CRMZBH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

ZBH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-5.83
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-85.48B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ZBH
$-4.43
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.05B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.07B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
27.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 27.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $185.85
Fair Value: $257.23
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ZBH
140.9% Overvalued
Price is 140.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $83.22
Fair Value: $34.55
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $186?

+8.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.2%

The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

ZBH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $83?

+14.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.0%

The market implies +14.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ZBH
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ZBH
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 95.7%Retail & Other 1.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,813
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ZBH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 104.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,305
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
2
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.38M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$865,827
@ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ZBH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $41.42M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$543,378
@ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$572,842
@ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ZBH
2
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $950,612
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$250,849
@ $94.66 · 2026-03-12
YI SANG
Officer
$96,490
@ $96.49 · 2026-02-12
YI SANG
Officer
$124,302
@ $103.58 · 2025-09-11
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$156,225
@ $104.15 · 2025-09-08
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$153,735
@ $102.49 · 2025-08-18
YI SANG
Officer
$74,011
@ $92.51 · 2025-06-13
YI SANG
Officer
$95,000
@ $95.00 · 2025-06-11
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$150,649
@ $104.40 · 2025-03-05
YI SANG
Officer
$1.47M
@ $114.69 · 2024-05-31
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ZBH
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
ZBH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
View CRM Full AnalysisView ZBH Full Analysis
CRM vs ZBH: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io