Compare StocksCRM vs TTD

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CRM is undervalued at $152, with a DCF intrinsic value of $274 and a margin of safety of 45%. TTD is undervalued at $19, with an intrinsic value of $35 and a margin of safety of 47%. Of the two, TTD has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78
VS
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
$18.51

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TTD
  • Gross margin of 77.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.27 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
TTD
Valuation
$16.55B
Free Cash Flow
$782.96M
13.32%
FCF Yield
9.00%
17.57
Trailing P/E
21.03
9.77
Forward P/E
8.61
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
7.89%
16.91%
ROE
16.74%
77.64%
Gross Margin
77.83%
0.77
PEG Ratio
0.90
Balance Sheet Safety
0.90
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.38
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.38
1.09%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
CRM: 6Ties: 3TTD: 3
CRMTTD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TTD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-7.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-117.14B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TTD
$-3.86
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.02B
Δ Market Cap
$-3.92B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
44.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 44.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $151.78
Fair Value: $273.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TTD
47.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 47.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $18.51
Fair Value: $35.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

+3.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.8%

The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

TTD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $19?

+5.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.0%

The market implies +5.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TTD
59/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TTD
-3.05
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,722
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TTD
Insiders 2.2%Institutions 89.6%Retail & Other 8.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,153
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.38M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$865,827
@ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TTD
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $148.10M
GREEN JEFFREY TERRY
Chief Executive Officer
$148.10M
@ $24.68 · 2026-03-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TTD
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.88M
JACOBSON SAMANTHA
Director
$1.13M
@ $21.14 · 2026-05-28
CUNNINGHAM ANDREA LEE
Director
$67,625
@ $48.20 · 2025-09-10
GRANT JAY R
Officer
$4.68M
@ $91.18 · 2025-08-07
SCHENKEIN LAURA
Chief Financial Officer
$368,662
@ $76.66 · 2025-05-16
WELLS DAVID B
Director
$2.29M
@ $79.88 · 2025-05-13
SCHENKEIN LAURA
Chief Financial Officer
$446,180
@ $70.00 · 2025-05-09
JACOBSON SAMANTHA
Officer and Director
$509,551
@ $118.56 · 2025-01-28
GRANT JAY R
Officer
$2.21M
@ $119.35 · 2024-12-30
JACOBSON SAMANTHA
Officer and Director
$513,316
@ $119.46 · 2024-12-30
JACOBSON SAMANTHA
Officer and Director
$2.83M
@ $128.25 · 2024-11-29
SCHENKEIN LAURA
Chief Financial Officer
$369,364
@ $117.97 · 2024-11-18
SCHENKEIN LAURA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.53M
@ $127.55 · 2024-11-07
SCHENKEIN LAURA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.01M
@ $120.43 · 2024-10-22
RAJARAM GOKUL
Director
$159,741
@ $117.89 · 2024-10-21
SCHENKEIN LAURA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $115.43 · 2024-10-09
GRANT JAY R
Officer
$2.24M
@ $108.65 · 2024-09-30
RAJARAM GOKUL
Director
$147,695
@ $109.00 · 2024-09-24
RAJARAM GOKUL
Director
$141,855
@ $104.69 · 2024-08-22
SCHENKEIN LAURA
Chief Financial Officer
$310,903
@ $99.33 · 2024-08-16
JACOBSON SAMANTHA
Officer and Director
$484,764
@ $99.50 · 2024-08-16
CUNNINGHAM ANDREA LEE
Director
$160,712
@ $100.07 · 2024-08-15
FALBERG KATHRYN E.
Director
$14.73M
@ $98.17 · 2024-08-13
JACOBSON SAMANTHA
Officer and Director
$2.11M
@ $99.50 · 2024-08-12
RAJARAM GOKUL
Director
$133,291
@ $98.37 · 2024-07-22
SCHENKEIN LAURA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.51M
@ $100.43 · 2024-07-09
GRANT JAY R
Officer
$13.78M
@ $97.42 · 2024-06-28
RAJARAM GOKUL
Director
$236,477
@ $97.92 · 2024-06-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TTD
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(20/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
TTD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (20)
View CRM Full AnalysisView TTD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs TTD

Is Salesforce, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TTD trades at a 47.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $35 vs. price $19), compared to CRM's 44.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $274 vs. $152).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.?

TTD scores 59/100 (Narrow moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TTD scores 4.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.?

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 13.3% free cash flow yield, compared to The Trade Desk, Inc.'s 9.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.?

CRM earns 9.6% ROIC versus TTD's 7.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.