Compare StocksCRM vs TMUS

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CRM is undervalued at $152, with a DCF intrinsic value of $274 and a margin of safety of 45%. TMUS is undervalued at $182, with an intrinsic value of $506 and a margin of safety of 64%. Of the two, TMUS has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78
VS
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
$181.67

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TMUS
  • Gross margin of 63.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.64 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CRM
    TMUS
    • FCF yield of 7.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • High leverage (2.12x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.66 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    TMUS
    Valuation
    $16.55B
    Free Cash Flow
    $15.43B
    13.32%
    FCF Yield
    7.85%
    17.57
    Trailing P/E
    19.33
    9.77
    Forward P/E
    13.00
    Quality & Moat
    9.61%
    ROIC
    9.65%
    16.91%
    ROE
    18.02%
    77.64%
    Gross Margin
    63.28%
    0.77
    PEG Ratio
    0.73
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.90
    Net Debt / Equity
    2.12
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.38
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.50
    1.09%
    Dividend Yield
    2.21%
    CRM: 7Ties: 2TMUS: 3
    CRMTMUS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TMUS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-7.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-117.14B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TMUS
    $2.31
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $22.48B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$52.00B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    44.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 44.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $151.78
    Fair Value: $273.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TMUS
    64.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 64.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $181.67
    Fair Value: $505.82
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

    +3.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.8%

    The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    TMUS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $182?

    +11.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.0%

    The market implies +11.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TMUS
    45/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TMUS
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,722
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TMUS
    Insiders 55.1%Institutions 43.9%Retail & Other 1.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,350
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.38M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TMUS
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.98M
    ALMEIDA ANDRE
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $196.20 · 2026-05-01
    GOPALAN SRINI
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.98M
    @ $201.82 · 2025-11-06
    NELSON MARK WOLFE
    General Counsel
    $12,446
    @ $188.58 · 2024-12-12
    ALMEIDA ANDRE
    Director
    $897,528
    @ $235.76 · 2024-12-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.30M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TMUS
    2
    Sells (3M)
    17
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $140.39M
    FREIER JON
    Chief Operating Officer
    $911,810
    @ $190.00 · 2026-05-21
    KATZ MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $979,050
    @ $195.81 · 2026-05-01
    DATAR SRIKANT MADHAV
    Director
    $727,640
    @ $221.10 · 2026-03-04
    SIEVERT G MICHAEL
    Director
    $3.30M
    @ $220.20 · 2026-02-24
    NELSON MARK WOLFE
    General Counsel
    $517,968
    @ $222.40 · 2026-02-24
    SIEVERT G MICHAEL
    Director
    $17.20M
    @ $214.94 · 2026-02-19
    NELSON MARK WOLFE
    General Counsel
    $3.64M
    @ $220.38 · 2026-02-18
    OSVALDIK PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.80M
    @ $214.86 · 2026-02-18
    LONG LETITIA A
    Director
    $306,436
    @ $210.32 · 2025-12-05
    SIEVERT G MICHAEL
    Director
    $9.70M
    @ $215.61 · 2025-11-18
    KATZ MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $539,775
    @ $215.91 · 2025-11-17
    DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $30.82M
    @ $239.15 · 2025-09-16
    SIEVERT G MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.54M
    @ $256.38 · 2025-08-19
    KATZ MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $627,800
    @ $251.12 · 2025-08-15
    FIELD CALLIE R
    Officer
    $2.96M
    @ $240.80 · 2025-07-29
    FREIER JON
    Officer
    $1.75M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-07-24
    DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $49.07M
    @ $234.19 · 2025-06-30
    SIEVERT G MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.92M
    @ $242.69 · 2025-05-20
    KATZ MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $592,800
    @ $237.12 · 2025-05-15
    DATAR SRIKANT MADHAV
    Director
    $191,990
    @ $263.00 · 2025-03-05
    OSVALDIK PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.58M
    @ $263.23 · 2025-02-27
    SIEVERT G MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.01M
    @ $266.82 · 2025-02-26
    EWALDSSON ULF
    Officer
    $5.16M
    @ $265.63 · 2025-02-21
    NELSON MARK WOLFE
    General Counsel
    $7.91M
    @ $262.66 · 2025-02-20
    FIELD CALLIE R
    Officer
    $2.72M
    @ $262.70 · 2025-02-19
    BAZZANO DARA A
    Officer
    $525,400
    @ $262.70 · 2025-02-19
    NELSON MARK WOLFE
    General Counsel
    $2.76M
    @ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
    FIELD CALLIE R
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
    BAZZANO DARA A
    Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $269.10 · 2025-02-18
    KATZ MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $675,000
    @ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
    TAYLOR TERESA A
    Director
    $1.89M
    @ $235.65 · 2025-02-03
    LONG LETITIA A
    Director
    $254,188
    @ $231.08 · 2024-12-13
    SIEVERT G MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.57M
    @ $239.22 · 2024-11-14
    SIEVERT G MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.51M
    @ $237.78 · 2024-11-12
    OSVALDIK PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.67M
    @ $233.55 · 2024-10-25
    NELSON MARK WOLFE
    General Counsel
    $9.25M
    @ $216.26 · 2024-10-16
    KATZ MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $615,900
    @ $205.30 · 2024-10-01
    CANO NESTOR
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $197.21 · 2024-08-19
    SIEVERT G MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.79M
    @ $194.81 · 2024-08-13
    KING DEEANNE
    Officer
    $2.93M
    @ $190.00 · 2024-08-08
    FREIER JON
    Officer
    $1.82M
    @ $181.87 · 2024-08-01
    KATZ MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $532,770
    @ $177.59 · 2024-07-01
    DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $70.71M
    @ $176.60 · 2024-06-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

    "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TMUS
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
    TMUS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView TMUS Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs TMUS

    Is Salesforce, Inc. or T-Mobile US, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TMUS trades at a 64.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $506 vs. price $182), compared to CRM's 44.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $274 vs. $152).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or T-Mobile US, Inc.?

    CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while TMUS scores 45/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is T-Mobile US, Inc. in financial distress?

    TMUS's Altman Z-Score of 1.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or T-Mobile US, Inc.?

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 13.3% free cash flow yield, compared to T-Mobile US, Inc.'s 7.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or T-Mobile US, Inc.?

    TMUS earns 9.6% ROIC versus CRM's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or T-Mobile US, Inc.'s?

    TMUS's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRM's 88/100 (Very Safe). TMUS has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

    CRM vs TMUS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io