Compare StocksCRM vs SYK

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Stryker Corporation (SYK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CRM is undervalued at $152, with a DCF intrinsic value of $274 and a margin of safety of 45%. SYK is overvalued at $308, with an intrinsic value of $226 and a margin of safety of -36%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78
VS
SYK
Stryker Corporation
$307.80

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
SYK
  • Gross margin of 64.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Stryker Corporation scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 28.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
SYK
Valuation
$16.55B
Free Cash Flow
$4.36B
13.32%
FCF Yield
3.69%
17.57
Trailing P/E
35.67
9.77
Forward P/E
18.40
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
9.31%
16.91%
ROE
15.20%
77.64%
Gross Margin
64.70%
0.77
PEG Ratio
1.48
Balance Sheet Safety
0.90
Net Debt / Equity
0.53
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.38
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.77
1.09%
Dividend Yield
1.13%
CRM: 7Ties: 3SYK: 2
CRMSYK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SYK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-7.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-117.14B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SYK
$7.26
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$5.76B
Δ Market Cap
+$41.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
44.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 44.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $151.78
Fair Value: $273.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SYK
36.0% Overvalued
Price is 36.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.80
Fair Value: $226.37
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

+3.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.8%

The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

SYK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $308?

+15.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.2%

The market implies +15.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SYK
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SYK
-2.63
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,722
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SYK
Insiders 5.4%Institutions 82.4%Retail & Other 12.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,088
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.38M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$865,827
@ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SYK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SYK
1
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.24M
FLETCHER ROBERT S
Officer
$1.39M
@ $306.87 · 2026-05-28
PIERCE JAMES ANDREW
Officer
$175,215
@ $368.87 · 2026-02-02
WELLS PRESTON WENDELL
Chief Financial Officer
$60,370
@ $365.88 · 2025-11-20
BERRY WILLIAM E JR
Officer
$713,802
@ $365.49 · 2025-11-14
MENON VIJU S
Officer
$195,305
@ $390.61 · 2025-08-25
FLETCHER ROBERT S
Officer
$701,630
@ $393.07 · 2025-08-20
BERRY WILLIAM E JR
Officer
$482,202
@ $388.56 · 2025-05-12
GOLSTON ALLAN C
Director
$941,586
@ $383.07 · 2025-02-18
STILES SPENCER S
Officer
$201,056
@ $391.16 · 2024-11-15
LOBO KEVIN A
Chief Executive Officer
$21.13M
@ $368.70 · 2024-11-07
FINK MARY KATHRYN
Officer
$3.48M
@ $367.65 · 2024-09-17
MENON VIJU S
Officer
$213,000
@ $355.00 · 2024-08-27
BOEHNLEIN GLENN S
Chief Financial Officer
$6.66M
@ $333.00 · 2024-08-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SYK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
SYK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View CRM Full AnalysisView SYK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs SYK

Is Salesforce, Inc. or Stryker Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 44.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $274 vs. price $152), compared to SYK's -36.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $226 vs. $308).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Stryker Corporation?

SYK scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. SYK scores 4.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Stryker Corporation?

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 13.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Stryker Corporation's 3.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Stryker Corporation?

CRM earns 9.6% ROIC versus SYK's 9.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Stryker Corporation's?

SYK's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRM's 88/100 (Very Safe). SYK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.