Compare StocksCRM vs SWK

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CRM is undervalued at $152, with a DCF intrinsic value of $274 and a margin of safety of 45%. SWK is fairly valued at $87, with an intrinsic value of $99 and a margin of safety of 12%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78
VS
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
$86.75

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
SWK

    Risks

    CRM
      SWK
      • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
      • FCF yield of 6.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
      • Trailing P/E of 35.6x is 34% above the historical average of 26.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      CRM
      SWK
      Valuation
      $16.55B
      Free Cash Flow
      $842.19M
      13.32%
      FCF Yield
      6.25%
      17.57
      Trailing P/E
      35.55
      9.77
      Forward P/E
      13.92
      Quality & Moat
      9.61%
      ROIC
      4.86%
      16.91%
      ROE
      4.17%
      77.64%
      Gross Margin
      30.62%
      0.77
      PEG Ratio
      1.39
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.90
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.74
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      2.38
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      3.97
      1.09%
      Dividend Yield
      4.01%
      CRM: 9Ties: 1SWK: 2
      CRMSWK

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      CRM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      SWK

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      CRM
      $-7.99
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $14.67B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-117.14B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      SWK
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-1.09B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$24.0M
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      CRM
      44.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 44.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $151.78
      Fair Value: $273.71
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      SWK
      12.0% Margin of Safety
      Price is 12.0% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $86.75
      Fair Value: $98.60
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      CRM

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

      +3.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -2.8%

      The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      SWK

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $87?

      +14.1%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +10.1%

      The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      CRM
      58/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      SWK
      48/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      CRM
      -2.73
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      SWK
      -2.78
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      CRM
      Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.8%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,722
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      SWK
      Insiders 0.3%Institutions 95.7%Retail & Other 4.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders984
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      CRM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      5
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $27.38M
      ALBER LAURA
      Director
      $500,266
      @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $500,178
      @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $500,722
      @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
      MORFIT G MASON
      Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
      $25.02M
      @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $865,827
      @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      SWK
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      CRM
      0
      Sells (3M)
      15
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $40.30M
      KROES NEELIE
      Director
      $929,276
      @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
      HARRIS G PARKER
      Officer and Director
      $31.61M
      @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $575,140
      @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $590,102
      @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $567,631
      @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $550,430
      @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $558,810
      @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $536,322
      @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $548,796
      @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.10M
      @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $547,344
      @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $539,533
      @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $555,001
      @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $552,798
      @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $545,384
      @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      SWK
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $812,764
      LINK JANET M
      General Counsel
      $812,764
      @ $69.08 · 2025-11-06
      LINK JANET M
      General Counsel
      $169,630
      @ $85.24 · 2025-02-07
      LINK JANET M
      General Counsel
      $1.40M
      @ $103.91 · 2024-08-01
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      CRM
      FearGreed
      🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

      "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      SWK
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(61/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      CRM
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
      SWK
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
      View CRM Full AnalysisView SWK Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs SWK

      Is Salesforce, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 44.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $274 vs. price $152), compared to SWK's 12.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $99 vs. $87).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.?

      CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while SWK scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. in financial distress?

      SWK's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.?

      Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 13.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s 6.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.?

      CRM earns 9.6% ROIC versus SWK's 4.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s?

      CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to SWK's 39/100 (Unsafe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

      CRM vs SWK: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io