Compare StocksCRM vs STT

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs State Street Corporation (STT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CRM is undervalued at $184, with a DCF intrinsic value of $222981480055 and a margin of safety of 100%. STT is undervalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $290 and a margin of safety of 36%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$184.02
VS
STT
State Street Corporation
$184.16

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
STT
  • State Street Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 20% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • PEG ratio of 0.78 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

CRM
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.81 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
STT
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 16.3x is 31% above the historical average of 12.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
STT
Valuation
$16.55B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
21.32
Trailing P/E
16.25
11.86
Forward P/E
12.08
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
N/A
16.91%
ROE
12.44%
77.64%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.76
PEG Ratio
0.78
Balance Sheet Safety
0.90
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
No debt
2.38
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.96%
Dividend Yield
2.00%
CRM: 2Ties: 2STT: 2
CRMSTT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

STT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-79.12
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
STT
$2.01
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.45B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.02
Fair Value: $222981480055.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
STT
36.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 36.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.16
Fair Value: $289.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

-21.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -21.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

STT

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
STT
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
STT
-2.42
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,568
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
STT
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 96.7%Retail & Other 2.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,612
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.52M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
STT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $312,475
PORTER BRIAN J
Director
$312,475
@ $124.99 · 2026-03-05
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Director
$10,551
@ $75.36 · 2024-10-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
STT
8
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $22.80M
HU W BRADFORD
Officer
$1.80M
@ $184.52 · 2026-07-24
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$1.02M
@ $184.17 · 2026-07-21
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.68M
@ $184.17 · 2026-07-21
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$895,290
@ $162.78 · 2026-06-11
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$243,210
@ $162.14 · 2026-06-08
HU W BRADFORD
Officer
$1.43M
@ $155.35 · 2026-05-26
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.26M
@ $155.35 · 2026-05-26
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$75,435
@ $150.87 · 2026-05-13
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$461,670
@ $153.89 · 2026-04-22
TAHIRI MOSTAPHA
Chief Operating Officer
$1.47M
@ $152.93 · 2026-04-22
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$2.00M
@ $124.32 · 2026-03-11
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $125.70 · 2026-03-02
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$319,775
@ $127.91 · 2026-02-24
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$721,420
@ $127.10 · 2026-02-23
AMBROSIUS JOERG
Officer
$1.12M
@ $128.00 · 2026-02-23
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$672,890
@ $118.55 · 2025-11-28
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$175,860
@ $117.24 · 2025-10-27
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$115,170
@ $115.17 · 2025-08-26
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $112.39 · 2025-08-21
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$175,046
@ $111.07 · 2025-08-19
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$108,197
@ $109.29 · 2025-07-22
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$1.07M
@ $96.61 · 2025-05-30
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$70,530
@ $94.04 · 2025-05-09
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$117,936
@ $90.72 · 2025-05-06
TAHIRI MOSTAPHA
Chief Operating Officer
$360,725
@ $90.43 · 2025-05-02
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$1.03M
@ $88.83 · 2025-05-01
BISEGNA ANTHONY C.
Officer
$310,590
@ $88.74 · 2025-05-01
DE SAINT AIGNAN PATRICK
Director
$1.94M
@ $98.24 · 2025-02-28
AMBROSIUS JOERG
Officer
$288,202
@ $100.07 · 2025-02-19
FOGARTY ANN
Officer
$368,536
@ $99.47 · 2025-02-18
DE SAINT AIGNAN PATRICK
Director
$802,479
@ $99.96 · 2025-02-18
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$1.22M
@ $97.97 · 2024-11-25
FOGARTY ANN
Officer
$146,955
@ $97.97 · 2024-11-25
MILROD DONNA M
Officer
$9,631
@ $95.36 · 2024-11-18
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$1.27M
@ $91.32 · 2024-10-18
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$46,250
@ $92.50 · 2024-10-17
HUNG YIE-HSIN
Chief Executive Officer
$325,500
@ $93.00 · 2024-10-16
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$1.01M
@ $82.91 · 2024-08-23
BISEGNA ANTHONY C.
Officer
$51,858
@ $80.65 · 2024-08-16
MILROD DONNA M
Officer
$8,226
@ $80.65 · 2024-08-16
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$542,080
@ $80.00 · 2024-08-15
ABOAF ERIC W
Chief Financial Officer
$553,630
@ $79.09 · 2024-08-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
STT
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
STT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View CRM Full AnalysisView STT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs STT

Is Salesforce, Inc. or State Street Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $222981480055 vs. price $184), compared to STT's 36.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $290 vs. $184).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or State Street Corporation?

STT scores 74/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is State Street Corporation in financial distress?

STT's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 0.8 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or State Street Corporation's?

STT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRM's 88/100 (Very Safe). STT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

CRM vs STT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io