Compare StocksCRM vs RTX

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs RTX Corporation (RTX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CRM is undervalued at $184, with a DCF intrinsic value of $222981480055 and a margin of safety of 100%. RTX is overvalued at $215, with an intrinsic value of $112 and a margin of safety of -92%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$184.02
VS
RTX
RTX Corporation
$215.22

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
RTX
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.48 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CRM
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.81 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
RTX
  • Gross margin of 20.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • PEG ratio of 2.70 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $3.8M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
RTX
Valuation
$16.55B
Free Cash Flow
$9.88B
N/A
FCF Yield
3.41%
21.32
Trailing P/E
37.89
11.86
Forward P/E
27.55
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
8.76%
16.91%
ROE
12.27%
77.64%
Gross Margin
20.35%
0.76
PEG Ratio
2.70
Balance Sheet Safety
0.90
Net Debt / Equity
0.45
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.38
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.92
0.96%
Dividend Yield
1.36%
CRM: 7Ties: 1RTX: 3
CRMRTX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RTX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-79.12
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RTX
$21.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$98.20B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.02
Fair Value: $222981480055.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RTX
91.8% Overvalued
Price is 91.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $215.22
Fair Value: $112.21
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

-21.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -21.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

RTX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $215?

+17.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.3%

The market implies +17.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RTX
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RTX
-2.30
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,568
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RTX
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 81.2%Retail & Other 18.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,085
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.52M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RTX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
WINNEFELD JAMES A. JR.
Director
$23,580
@ $117.90 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RTX
3
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $46.09M
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.50M
@ $214.68 · 2026-07-28
ATKINSON TRACY A
Director
$500,424
@ $218.05 · 2026-07-27
BRUNK TROY D
Officer
$1.80M
@ $210.29 · 2026-07-24
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$2.58M
@ $202.83 · 2026-02-23
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$7.35M
@ $205.56 · 2026-02-19
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$12.96M
@ $203.80 · 2026-02-19
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$3.10M
@ $204.65 · 2026-02-19
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.64M
@ $201.30 · 2026-02-13
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$3.49M
@ $199.16 · 2026-02-12
JOHNSON AMY L.
Officer
$1.58M
@ $195.03 · 2026-02-10
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$858,278
@ $178.32 · 2025-10-27
ATKINSON TRACY A
Director
$500,948
@ $178.91 · 2025-10-24
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$873,528
@ $180.15 · 2025-10-24
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$4.15M
@ $159.79 · 2025-08-27
BRUNK TROY D
Officer
$1.19M
@ $155.20 · 2025-08-12
JASPER PHILIP J
Officer
$2.03M
@ $157.82 · 2025-08-04
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.36M
@ $156.20 · 2025-07-24
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$222,600
@ $152.26 · 2025-07-23
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$2.33M
@ $137.62 · 2025-06-03
JOHNSON AMY L.
Officer
$528,777
@ $127.54 · 2025-05-06
MITCHILL NEIL G JR
Chief Financial Officer
$2.10M
@ $130.35 · 2025-02-27
CALIO CHRISTOPHER T
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $130.36 · 2025-02-27
MAHARAJH RAMSARAN JR
General Counsel
$2.46M
@ $126.82 · 2025-02-25
BRUNK TROY D
Officer
$361,736
@ $125.95 · 2025-02-24
DASILVA KEVIN G
Officer and Treasurer
$1.30M
@ $125.08 · 2025-02-19
EDDY SHANE G
Officer
$1.95M
@ $124.45 · 2025-02-18
WILLIAMS DANTAYA M
Officer
$1.81M
@ $129.23 · 2025-02-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RTX
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
RTX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View CRM Full AnalysisView RTX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs RTX

Is Salesforce, Inc. or RTX Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $222981480055 vs. price $184), compared to RTX's -91.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $112 vs. $215).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or RTX Corporation?

CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while RTX scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RTX scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or RTX Corporation?

CRM earns 9.6% ROIC versus RTX's 8.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or RTX Corporation's?

CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to RTX's 78/100 (Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

CRM vs RTX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io